微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)主席(Sgabello)
品名(英)Chair (Sgabello)
入馆年号1930年,30.93.2
策展部门欧洲雕塑和装饰艺术European Sculpture and Decorative Arts
创作者Workshop of Giuliano da Maiano (1432–1490) and Benedetto da Maiano (1442–1497)【1432 至 1497】
创作年份公元 1484 - 公元 1496
创作地区
分类木工家具(Woodwork-Furniture)
尺寸高 58 x 宽 16-3/4 x 深 16-1/2 英寸 (147.3 x 42.5 x 41.9 厘米)
介绍(中)Strozzi 椅子是世界上最著名和最常出版的座椅家具之一。[1]1900年后不久,在意大利文艺复兴时期的家具与古典大师画作一样珍贵的时期,汉斯·斯特格曼称其为"举世闻名的独角兽"。迷人的美感杰作,周围最美丽的佛罗伦萨家具之一。[2] 鉴于它的名气,令人惊讶的是,关于这把椅子的最新出版物依赖于维也纳银行家阿尔伯特·菲格多(Albert Figdor)1930年收藏目录中的信息,后者于1870年代从佛罗伦萨的斯特罗齐王子手中获得了它,而忽略了后来的调查。[3]

sgabello 的形式来源于一个低矮的凳子,三条腿(一个 tre gambe)以一定角度安装,这是一种非常简单的座椅类型,自古以来就很受欢迎。4]通过添加细长的靠背,设计师表现出对形状和装饰的异常敏感,以及家具中罕见的微妙程度。靠背、座椅两侧和脚部的装饰由精致的雕刻元素和一小段几何镶嵌线组成。后者有意识地与胡桃木的戏剧性脉络形成鲜明对比。优雅的概念和对细节的关注表明,对于所有参与其中的工匠来说,这是一个非常特别的任务。

靠背的轮廓似乎可以与孔雀的羽毛相媲美。一个普通的中央面板支撑着顶部的通多,在"眼睛"中,带有三个新月(arme delle tre lune)和奢华的鼠尾草装饰的斯特罗齐徽章在打孔背景下脱颖而出。加冕的是一只蜕皮的猎鹰的形象。在背景中,羽毛从鸟儿张开的翅膀上以圆周运动的方式倾泻而下。

盾牌内的三个新月形可以在通多的背面再次看到,在凹槽太阳图案的前面。环绕带由基点处的四个玫瑰花结组成,由羽毛鳞片连接,按不同方向排列。整个同栋的正面和背面都由新月花环框住,这是对斯特罗齐家的另一个暗示。[5]继威廉·冯·博德之后,弗里达·肖特米勒评论说,为菲利波·迪·马泰奥·迪·西蒙娜·斯特罗齐(1428-1491)制作的奖章的背面,以"尼科洛·菲奥伦蒂诺的方式"被用作通多正面的模型。[6]其他早期作家将奖章以及sgabello的设计归功于朱利亚诺和贝内代托·达·马亚诺的工作室。两兄弟都经常受雇于斯特罗齐。[7]文件显示,1467年,菲利波·斯特罗齐从朱利亚诺·达·马亚诺(Giuliano da Maiano)那里订购了自己一个镶嵌丰富的卡松,以及一个lettuccio或长凳。[8]这枚勋章现在令人信服地归属于尼科洛·菲奥伦蒂诺(1430-1514),可能是在1489年8月6日在斯特罗齐宫举行的奠基仪式上委托的。[9]它存在于多个副本中,可以很容易地被其他工匠检查。[10]

作为一个显眼的展示对象,四面都装饰着,旨在独立,sgabello应该在斯特罗齐宫的背景下进行解释。以新月为连接元素,与建筑的装饰无缝契合。月亮图案不仅可以在立面的双窗和著名的大型铁灯笼中找到,还可以在内部的支撑支架、壁炉框架和家具面板中找到。虽然说这些图案的存在是"装饰性计划"的特征可能过分了,但向所有人展示的纹章镰刀月亮是一个整体不可分割的一部分,这是一个宣传项目的一部分,旨在增强贵族所有者菲利波·斯特罗齐的宏伟(见第 14.39 号)。[11]

猎鹰,菲利波的个人标志,或impresa,在tondo上也起到rebus的作用:鹰猎者的意大利语单词是strozziere。蜕皮的猎鹰一直是更新的隐喻。但这里的意思并不是所有的羽毛都会脱落和更换,例如鸭子,它们在几周内无法飞行,很容易成为食肉动物的猎物。飞燕隼张开、完美无瑕的翅膀证明它的羽毛只能部分自我更新,而且这只鸟总是能够保护自己和攻击潜在的敌人。因此,菲利波的猎鹰象征着面对考验的准备,更新和克服逆境的潜力。

通多和奖章之间的相似性不仅证明两者都必须与菲利波·斯特罗齐(Filippo Strozzi)作为赞助人直接相关,而且还提供了主席日期的线索:委员会的执行必须发生在1489年之间,当时勋章被铸造并开始宫殿的工作,直到1491年5月15日, 斯特罗齐去世的那天。在那之后的任何时候都不太可能,因为斯特罗齐的继任者几乎肯定会选择一种不同的装饰,来代表他自己。

三条腿可能是经过深思熟虑的选择,如果是天才的话,它将在不平坦的地面上纠正椅子的位置;它们为tondo奠定了坚实的基础,强调了主人的力量,坚固和纪律,他从不放弃希望,坚定不移地支持他的家人和朋友。这些美德是菲利波在1458年至1466年间从佛罗伦萨流亡期间的特征。[12]

十五世纪佛罗伦萨的知识分子骚动无疑在椅子的概念中发挥了作用。Leonbattista Alberti(1404-1472)在他的论文De Re Aedificatoria(关于建筑的艺术)中提出了革命性的想法,即不同类型的建筑应该设计以反映在其中生活和工作的人的要求。正如马丁·坎普(Martin Kemp)所指出的那样,阿尔贝蒂的一些直接继任者走得更远,坚持认为建筑的各个方面,"从柱子顶部的首都设计到城市的整体规划,都要由严格比例的几何形状来管理。[13]这些想法可以很容易地扩展到宫殿及其家具。斯特罗齐椅子上另一个有趣的反映是佛罗伦萨知识分子对空间秩序的热情兴趣,即八角形的座位反映了佛罗伦萨洗礼堂的平面图,甚至延伸到高坛的壁龛。这个突出的空间被细长的靠背填满在椅子上,支撑着菲利波·斯特罗齐的印后腿。[14]洗礼堂是菲利波·布鲁内莱斯基(Filippo Brunelleschi,1377?-1446)通过制定一种在平面上准确再现三维的方法彻底改变了绘画,并用作他著名的透视投影的主题。[15]阿尔贝蒂和布鲁内莱斯基的思想流经佛罗伦萨艺术界,就像美第奇银行的钱流经政治一样。任何创新的艺术家都无法不对这种创作氛围做出回应。

sgabello不是舒适的奇迹,但它不是故意的。作为一件展示品,它代表了实用的中世纪形式和人文文艺复兴时期设计的罕见结合。当然,它是有史以来最不寻常的家具之一,其中意义与美感以无与伦比的和谐融合在一起。[16]

脚注:
1.本条目基于沃尔夫拉姆·科普。"大都会艺术博物馆的法国和意大利文艺复兴时期家具:调查笔记。"阿波罗138号(1994年6月),第24-32页。
2. 汉斯·斯特格曼。Die Holzmöbel der Sammlung Figdor.维也纳,第 2 版,1909 年。
3. 阿尔伯特·菲格多博士,1930年,第1卷,第2卷,第657号。最新的出版物是克劳迪奥·保里尼。Il mobile del Rinascimento: La collezione Herbert Percy Horne.佛罗伦萨,2002年,第68-70页,第9期。该作品的作者多次错误地提到,这种设计的两把椅子在大都会博物馆的收藏中。
4. 幸存下来的古代三脚架桌表明可能有匹配的椅子,例如希尔德斯海姆宝藏中的"折叠"银三脚架; 见琼·利弗西奇。"希腊,罗马。"在《世界家具:图解历史》(World Furniture: A Illustrated History)中,海伦娜·海沃德(Helena Hayward)编辑,第14-18页。纽约,1965年,第17页,图。32. 中世纪插图中出现了许多三脚椅;见道格拉斯·阿什。"哥特式。"在《世界家具:图解历史》中,海伦娜·海沃德(Helena Hayward)编辑,第26-24页。纽约,1965年,第26页,图。55岁,还有约翰·莫利。家具的历史:西方传统二十五个世纪的风格和设计。波士顿,1999年,第90页,图。158.5
.1995年,大都会博物馆文物保护部副保护员Marijn Manuels对Strozzi椅子进行了精心修复。他更换了通多周围缺失的碎片,包括几个新月形。请参阅大都会博物馆谢尔曼费尔柴尔德物品保护中心档案中的保护报告。
6. 弗里达·肖特米勒。Wohnungskultur und Möbel der Italienischen Renaissance。斯图加特,1921年,第二十七页;另见洛伦佐·斯特罗齐。Vita di Filippo Strozzi: Il Vecchio.佛罗伦萨,1851年;和约翰·罗素·塞尔。菲利波·里皮在新圣母玛利亚教堂的斯特罗齐教堂。美术优秀论文。纽约和伦敦,1979年,第7-99页。
7. 奥古斯托·佩德里尼。Il mobilio: Gli ambienti e le decorazioni del Rinascimento in Italia, secoli XV e XVI. 新编.佛罗伦萨,1948年,第55页。
8. 约翰·罗素·塞尔。菲利波·里皮在新圣母玛利亚教堂的斯特罗齐教堂。美术优秀论文。纽约和伦敦,1979年,第12页
9.斯蒂芬 K. 谢尔,编辑。名望的货币:文艺复兴时期的肖像奖章。呵呵。猫,弗里克收藏。纽约,1994年,第135页,第44号。
10. 乔治·弗朗西斯·希尔。切利尼之前的文艺复兴时期意大利奖章语料库。2卷。伦敦,1930年,第1018号。
11. 在斯特罗齐手臂上,参见赫尔穆特镍。"斯特罗齐号的两个猎鹰装置:解释的尝试。"大都会博物馆杂志 9 (1974),第 229-32 页;和洛伦兹·西利格。"'Ein Willkomme in der Form eines Mohrenkopfs von Silber getreibener Arbeit': Der wiederentdeckte Mohrenkopfpokal Christoph Jamnitzers aus dem späten 16.贾尔洪德特。艾克尔曼2002年,第59-65页。
12. 约翰罗素销售。菲利波·里皮在新圣母玛利亚教堂的斯特罗齐教堂。美术优秀论文。纽约和伦敦,1979年,第9-14页。
13. 马丁肯普。"万物之均值。"在《约1492年:探索时代的艺术》(Circa 1492: Art in the Age of Exploration)中,Jay A. Levenson编辑,第95-111页。呵呵。cat.,国家美术馆,华盛顿特区,华盛顿特区,纽黑文和伦敦,1992年,第99页。
14. 安东尼奥·保鲁奇,编辑《佛罗伦萨圣乔瓦尼洗礼堂》。 2卷 意大利米拉比利亚 2.摩德纳,1994年,第2卷,第29、205页。
15. 马丁·肯普。"万物之均值。"在《约1492年:探索时代的艺术》(Circa 1492: Art in the Age of Exploration)中,Jay A. Levenson编辑,第95-111页。呵呵。cat.,国家美术馆,华盛顿特区,华盛顿特区,纽黑文和伦敦,1992年,第98页,图。
4.16.椅子是独一无二的;对这种形式的几种现有解释是更晚的。以前在曼海默收藏和现在在阿姆斯特丹国立博物馆的两个类似的例子是十九世纪的简化版本。我非常感谢Reinier Baarsen在1998年与我一起检查它们,并让我有机会研究国立博物馆档案中的相关材料。另外两个例子,在莱默斯-丹福斯·萨姆隆,韦茨拉尔,也必须追溯到十九世纪,尽管我在 1992 年将它们描述为"佛罗伦萨,大约 1490 年";见沃尔夫拉姆·科普。Die Lemmers-Danforth-Sammlung Wetzlar: Europäische Wohnkultur aus Renaissance und Barock.海德堡,1992年,第74-75页,第74-75页。M7a,b,颜色不适。第169页,其中还提到了一些进一步的例子。佛罗伦萨霍恩基金会博物馆的两把椅子与莱默斯-丹福斯的作品密切相关,但我还没有能够在那里亲自检查它们;见克劳迪奥·保里尼。Il mobile del Rinascimento: La collezione Herbert Percy Horne.佛罗伦萨,2002年,第68-70页,第9期。
介绍(英)The Strozzi chair is one of the best-known and most often published pieces of seating furniture in the world.[1] Shortly after 1900, in a period when Italian Renaissance furniture was as highly prized as old-master paintings, Hans Stegmann called it a "unicum known the world over. . . a masterwork of charming beauty, one of the most beautiful Florentine pieces of furniture around."[2] Given its celebrity, it is astonishing that the most recent publications on the chair rely on information in the 1930 catalogue of the collection of the Viennese banker Albert Figdor, who acquired it in the 1870s from Prince Strozzi in Florence, and ignore later investigations.[3]

The form of the sgabello derives from a low stool with three legs (a tre gambe) mounted at an angle, a very simple type of seat that had been popular since ancient times.[4] By adding an elongated backrest, the designer demonstrated unusual sensitivity to shape and ornament and a degree of subtlety that is rarely found in furniture. The decoration on the back, sides of the seat, and feet consists of delicately carved elements and a small line of geometric inlay. The latter is consciously contrasted with the dramatic veining of the walnut wood. The elegant concept and the attention given to minute details indicate that this was a very special commission for all the artisans involved.

The backrest seems comparable in silhouette to a peacock's feather. A plain center panel supports the tondo on top, in the "eye" of which the Strozzi coat of arms with three crescent moons (arme delle tre lune) and lavish acanthus decoration stand out against a punched background. Crowning this is the image of a molting falcon. In the background, feathers cascade down in a circular movement from the spread wings of the bird.

The three crescents within a shield can be seen again on the reverse of the tondo, in front of a fluted sun motif. The encircling band consists of four rosettes at the cardinal points connected by feathered scales arranged in divergent directions. The whole tondo-front and back-is framed by a wreath of crescent moons, another allusion to the house of Strozzi.[5] Following Wilhelm von Bode, Frida Schottmüller remarked that the reverse of a medal made for Filippo di Matteo di Simone Strozzi (1428–1491), in the "manner of Niccolò Fiorentino," was used as the model for the front of the tondo.[6] Other early writers ascribed the medal as well as the design of the sgabello to the workshop of Giuliano and Benedetto da Maiano. Both brothers were regularly employed by Strozzi.[7] Documents show that in 1467 Filippo Strozzi ordered from Giuliano da Maiano a richly inlaid cassone for himself, as well as a lettuccio, or bench.[8] The medal, which has now convincingly been attributed to Niccolò Fiorentino (1430–1514), was probably commissioned for the cornerstone ceremony at the Strozzi Palace, on 6 August 1489.[9] It exists in multiple copies and could easily have been examined by other artisans.[10]

As a conspicuous display object, embellished on all sides and intended to be freestanding, the sgabello should be interpreted in the context of the Strozzi Palace. With the crescent moon as a connecting element, it fits seamlessly into the decoration of the building. The moon motif can be found not only in the biforium windows of the facade and the famous large iron lanterns but also in the interior, in the supporting brackets, fireplace frames, and furniture panels. While it might be too much to say that the presence of such motifs characterizes a "decorative program," the heraldic sickle moons displayed for everyone to see are an inseparable part of a totality, of a propaganda project to enhance the grandeur of the aristocratic owner, Filippo Strozzi (see acc. no. 14.39).[11]

The falcon, Filippo's personal emblem, or impresa, on the tondo also functions as a rebus: the Italian word for falconer is strozziere. A molting falcon has always been a metaphor for renewal. But what is meant here is not that all the feathers will be shed and replaced, as is the case with ducks, for instance, which become incapable of flying for several weeks and fall easy prey to carnivores. The spread, flawless wings of the swift falcon prove that its plumage renews itself only partially and that the bird always remains capable of defending itself and of attacking potential enemies. The falcon of Filippo's impresa thus signifies a prepared readiness in the face of trial, a potential for renewal and for overcoming adversity.

The similarity between the tondo and the medal not only proves that both must be directly linked to Filippo Strozzi as patron but also gives a clue to the date of the chair: the execution of the commission must have taken place between 1489, when the medal was struck and work on the palace begun, and 15 May 1491, the day of Strozzi's death. Any time after that is highly unlikely, since Strozzi's successor would almost certainly have chosen a different decoration, fashioned to represent himself.

A calculated choice, probably, and if so a stroke of genius, are the three legs, which will correct the chair's position on uneven ground; they form a firm base for the tondo, underlining the strength, sturdiness, and discipline of the owner, who never gives up hope and steadfastly supports his family and friends. These virtues had characterized Filippo during his exile from Florence between 1458 and 1466.[12]

The intellectual ferment in fifteenth-century Florence undoubtedly played a role in the chair's conception. In his treatise De Re Aedificatoria (On the Art of Building) Leonbattista Alberti (1404–1472) put forward the revolutionary idea that different types of buildings should be designed to reflect the requirements of those who live and work in them. As Martin Kemp has pointed out, some of Alberti's immediate successors went still further, maintaining that every aspect of architecture, "from the design of a capital at the top of a column to the overall plan of a city was to be governed by a rigorously proportional geometry."[13] These ideas could easily be extended to apply to a palace and its furnishings. Another intriguing reflection in the Strozzi chair of the passionate interest among the Florentine intellectuals in the ordering of space is the fact that the octagonal seat reflects the floor plan of the Florentine Baptistery, even to the high altar's niche. That protruding space is filled in the chair by the elongated back, which supports Filippo Strozzi's impresa.[14] The Baptistery was the building that Filippo Brunelleschi (1377?–1446), who had revolutionized painting by working out a method for accurately reproducing the third dimension on a flat surface, used as the subject of his famous perspectival projections.[15] The ideas of Alberti and Brunelleschi flowed through the Florentine artistic community as the money of the Medici bank flowed through politics. No innovative artist could help but respond to this creative climate.

The sgabello is not a marvel of comfort, but it was not intended to be. A display piece, it represents a rare combination of a practical medieval form and a humanistic Renaissance design. Certainly it is one of the most unusual pieces of furniture ever made, one in which meaning and beauty mingle in unrivaled harmony.[16]

Footnotes:
1. This entry is based on Wolfram Koeppe. "French and Italian Renaissance Furniture at The Metropolitan Museum of Art: Notes on a Survey." Apollo 138 (June 1994), pp. 24–32.
2. Hans Stegmann. Die Holzmöbel der Sammlung Figdor. 2nd ed. Vienna, 1909.
3. Die Sammlung Dr. Albert Figdor 1930, pt. 1, vol. 2, no. 657. The latest publication is Claudio Paolini. Il mobile del Rinascimento: La collezione Herbert Percy Horne. Florence, 2002, pp. 68-70, no. 9. The author of that work mentions several times in error that two chairs of this design are in the Metropolitan Museum's collection.
4. Ancient tripod tables that have survived suggest that there may have been matching chairs, like the "folding" silver tripod from the Hildesheim Treasure; see Joan Liversidge. "Greece, Rome." In World Furniture: A Illustrated History, ed. Helena Hayward, pp. 14–18. New York, 1965, p. 17, fig. 32. Many tripod chairs appear in medieval illustrations; see Douglas Ash. "Gothic." In World Furniture: An Illustrated History, ed. Helena Hayward, pp. 26–24. New York, 1965, p. 26, fig. 55, and John Morley. The History of Furniture: Twenty-five Centuries of Style and Design in the Western Tradition. Boston, 1999, p. 90, fig. 158.
5. In 1995 the Strozzi chair was superbly restored by Marijn Manuels, Associate Conservator, Department of Objects Conservation, Metropolitan Museum. He replaced missing pieces, including several crescents, around the tondo. See the conservation report in the archives of the Sherman Fairchild Center for Objects Conservation, Metropolitan Museum.
6. Frida Schottmüller. Wohnungskultur und Möbel der italienischen Renaissance. Stuttgart, 1921, p. XXVII; see also Lorenzo Strozzi. Vita di Filippo Strozzi: Il Vecchio. Florence, 1851; and John Russell Sale. Filippo Lippi's Strozzi Chapel in Santa Maria Novella. Outstanding Dissertations in the Fine Arts. New York and London 1979, pp. 7-99.
7. Augusto Pedrini. Il mobilio: Gli ambienti e le decorazioni del Rinascimento in Italia, secoli XV e XVI. New ed. Florence, 1948, p. 55.
8. John Russell Sale. Filippo Lippi's Strozzi Chapel in Santa Maria Novella. Outstanding Dissertations in the Fine Arts. New York and London 1979, p. 12
9. Stephen K. Scher, ed. The Currency of Fame: Portrait Medals of the Renaissance. Exh. cat., Frick Collection. New York, 1994, p. 135, no. 44.
10. George Francis Hill. A Corpus of Italian Medals of the Renaissance before Cellini. 2 vols. London, 1930, no. 1018.
11. On the Strozzi arms, see Helmut Nickel. "Two Falcon Devices of the Strozzi: An Attempt at Interpretation." Metropolitan Museum Journal 9 (1974), pp. 229–32; and Lorenz Seelig. "'Ein Willkomme in der Form eines Mohrenkopfs von Silber getreibener Arbeit': Der wiederentdeckte Mohrenkopfpokal Christoph Jamnitzers aus dem späten 16. Jahrhundert." In Eikelmann 2002, pp. 59-65.
12. John Russell Sale. Filippo Lippi's Strozzi Chapel in Santa Maria Novella. Outstanding Dissertations in the Fine Arts. New York and London 1979, pp. 9-14.
13. Martin Kemp. "The Mean and Measure of All Things." In Circa 1492: Art in the Age of Exploration, ed. Jay A. Levenson, pp. 95–111. Exh. cat., National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. Washington D.C., New Haven, and London, 1992, p. 99.
14. Antonio Paolucci, ed. Il Battistero di San Giovanni a Firenze/The Baptistery of San Giovanni, Florence. 2 vols. Mirabilia italiae 2. Modena, 1994, vol. 2, pp. 29, 205.
15. Martin Kemp. "The Mean and Measure of All Things." In Circa 1492: Art in the Age of Exploration, ed. Jay A. Levenson, pp. 95–111. Exh. cat., National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. Washington D.C., New Haven, and London, 1992, p. 98, fig. 4.
16. The chair is unique; several existing interpretations of the form are of a much later date. Two similar examples formerly in the Mannheimer collection and now in the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, are simplified nineteenth-century versions. I am most grateful to Reinier Baarsen for examining them with me in 1998 and for giving me the opportunity to study related material in the Rijksmuseum files. Two other examples, in the Lemmers-Danforth Sammlung, Wetzlar, must also be dated to the nineteenth century, although I described them in 1992 as "Florence, circa 1490"; see Wolfram Koeppe. Die Lemmers-Danforth-Sammlung Wetzlar: Europäische Wohnkultur aus Renaissance und Barock. Heidelberg, 1992, pp. 74-75, no. M7a, b, color ill. p. 169, where some further examples are also mentioned. Two chairs in the Museo della Fondazione Horne, Florence, are closely related to the Lemmers-Danforth pieces, but I have not yet been able to examine them personally there; see Claudio Paolini. Il mobile del Rinascimento: La collezione Herbert Percy Horne. Florence, 2002, pp. 68-70, no. 9.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。