微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)带盖子的圆柱形容器
品名(英)Cylindrical container with cover
入馆年号1941年,41.190.46a, b
策展部门欧洲雕塑和装饰艺术European Sculpture and Decorative Arts
创作者
创作年份公元 1530 - 公元 1550
创作地区
分类雕塑青铜(Sculpture-Bronze)
尺寸整体 .46 a, b (confirmed): 4 1/2 × 6 1/4 × 6 1/4 英寸 (11.4 × 15.9 × 15.9 厘米)
介绍(中)这种不寻常的容器形状是一个低而圆的圆柱体,有一个带凹槽的盖子和一个由三个雌性头部组成的把手,它们的背部相互连接。该船的鼓状主体在顶部和底部有几个不同直径的饰条,在饰条之间有一个凹形雕带,装饰有三个男性面具和三个倾斜的推杆。后者几乎是三维建模的,右侧由手臂支撑,小手抓住容器的下边缘,左手叉腰放在左髋上。小翅膀安装在上缘下方,头部向左看起来有点不安。所有三个推杆都以相同的姿势渲染,但似乎是单独建模的。面具展示了一张留着胡子的男性脸,有着肉嘟嘟的鼻子,沉重而收缩的眉毛,树叶般的耳朵,在狂野的鬃毛下从太阳穴长出扭曲的角。他们张着嘴,好像在大喊大叫,人们想知道这是否是推杆手看着他们的原因,几乎好像对他们从平静的睡眠中醒来感到恼火

容器的造型清新、充满活力,略显粗略。推杆的身体和头部被微小的锤击所活跃,这些锤击也出现在面具的突出部分。峡谷的背景布满了圆形的小印记,形成了粗糙的纹理,与推杆和口罩的光滑果肉形成对比。这些饰条给人的印象是在转盘上制作的,有点不平衡,使容器呈现出明显的"手工"外观

另一方面,盖子更完美地是圆形的,有清晰的三角形,但宽度有所不同。虽然盖子可能是原装的,但中央把手的工艺似乎不同,可能是以后的更换或添加。三头合一是否可以解释为普律当斯基本美德的三种性质(记忆、智慧、天意),这很难说。它们可能只是对容器上的三个推杆和三个口罩的回应,由于它们都展示了一个年轻女性的同一张脸,所以它们的目的可能主要是装饰性的

在与Desiderio da Firenze有关的作品中也可以找到相同类型的推杆和面具,Desiderioo da Firenz是一位仍然相当神秘的艺术家,对他知之甚少。他唯一有文献记载的作品是帕多瓦奇维科博物馆的青铜大投票瓮,他在1532年3月至1533年2月期间为该市的大议会执行了该瓮。在有关这件作品的文献中,德西德里奥被称为"雕塑家和创始人";然而,他似乎主要是一名施法者,尽管他是一名天赋异禀的施法者。投票瓮是他唯一可靠的作品,其质量导致了大量作品的重建,这些作品有时会引起激烈的争论,[1]这使他基本上处于巴东雕塑家里奇奥的艺术圈中

最早属于Riccio的一类物品,现在被认为是Desiderio的作品,是顶部有satyrs的圆柱形香水燃烧器。[2] 其中一些在中央鼓和顶部之间有一个带有三个倾斜推杆的凹槽,这些推杆在姿势、造型和位置上与我们容器上的推杆非常相似。此外,投票罐上的口罩虽然放在中间部分,稍大一些,但几乎与容器上的口盖相同,仅在耳朵外面的小弯曲带中发散(图21a)。投票瓮和容器的进一步比较不仅揭示了装饰细节的相似生动但略显粗糙的造型,而且推杆虽然成分不同,但显示出完全相同的头部(图21b)。因此,就风格和工艺而言,毫无疑问,正如Jeremy Warren提出的那样,该集装箱来自Desiderio da Firenze的车间。[3]

Desiderio的作品似乎主要由实用的青铜器组成,因此像我们的例子这样的容器适合他的作品。众所周知,他将一件物品的部分重新用于另一件具有不同功能的物品,这种做法与文艺复兴时期威尼托的作坊传统一致。大都会博物馆的容器形状很奇怪,看起来有点像一个糖碗。它有时被解释为一个墨水架,尽管那个时期大多数已知的墨水井都较小,形状为矩形。也许它是用来装沙子的。虽然人们普遍对不符合特定图案的功能性青铜器持怀疑态度,但这件物品的整体质量证明了文艺复兴时期的真正创造
-CKG

脚注
。沃伦2001a;Jestaz 2005年
2.参见MMA,1975.1.1396。关于华盛顿特区阿什莫尔国家美术馆(Ashmolean)和艺术市场(前阿伦伯格收藏)的演员阵容,请参阅沃伦2014,第200-201页。
介绍(英)The unusual receptacle has the shape of a low, round cylinder with a gadrooned lid and a handle formed of three female heads attached to each other at their backs. The vessel’s drumlike body has several moldings of different diameters on top and bottom and, between the moldings, a concave frieze decorated with three male masks alternating with three reclining putti. The latter, modeled almost in three dimensions, rest on their right sides supported by their arms, their tiny hands gripping the lower rim of the container, while their left hands are placed akimbo on their left hips. The little wings are fitted below the upper rim, and the heads look with a slightly troubled expression to the left. All three putti are rendered in the same pose but seem to be modeled individually. The masks show a bearded male face with fleshy nose, heavy, contracted brows, leaflike ears, and twisted horns growing from the temples under a wild mane. Their mouths are open as if shouting, and one wonders if this is the reason the putti look at them, almost as if annoyed that they have been awakened from a restful sleep.

The modeling of the container is fresh, vibrant, and slightly sketchy. The bodies and heads of the putti have been enlivened by tiny hammer strokes, which are also seen on the salient parts of the masks. The background of the gorge is covered with small, circular punch marks, achieving a coarse texture as a contrast to the smoother flesh of the putti and masks. The moldings, which give the impression of having been created on a turning table, are slightly lopsided, lending the container a distinctly “handmade” appearance.

The lid, on the other hand, is more perfectly round, with sharply defined gadroons, which, however, differ somewhat in their width. While the lid could be original, the central handle seems to be of different workmanship and may be a later replacement or addition. Whether the three heads merging into one can be interpreted as the three natures of the cardinal virtue of Prudence (memory, intelligence, providence) is difficult to say. They may simply be a response to the three putti and three masks on the container, and since all show the same face of a young woman, their purpose is probably mainly decorative.

The same type of putti and masks can be found on works associated with Desiderio da Firenze, a still rather mysterious artist about whom very little is known. His only documented work is the large voting urn made of bronze in the Museo Civico in Padua, which he executed between March 1532 and February 1533 for the Great Council of that city. In the documents concerning this piece, Desiderio is called “sculptor and founder”; however, he seems to have been primarily a caster, although a very gifted one. The quality of the voting urn, his only secure creation, has led to the reconstruction of a considerable oeuvre of sometimes hotly debated attributions,[1] which places him essentially in the artistic circle of the Paduan sculptor Riccio.

One category of objects that were first attributed to Riccio and now are considered works by Desiderio are cylindrical perfume burners topped by satyrs.[2] Some of these feature between the central drum and the top section a groove with three reclining putti that are very similar in pose, modeling, and placement to those on our container. Moreover, the masks on the voting urn, although placed in the middle section and slightly larger, are almost identical to those on the container, diverging only in the small curving bands growing out of the ears (fig. 21a). Further comparison of the voting urn and the container reveals not only a similar vibrant but slightly rough modeling of the decorative details, but also that the putti, while varying in composition, display exactly the same kind of heads (fig. 21b). Thus, in terms of style and workmanship, there can be no doubt that the container is from the workshop of Desiderio da Firenze, as has been proposed by Jeremy Warren.[3]

Desiderio’s oeuvre seems to consist mostly of utilitarian bronzes, and so a container such as our example would fit with his production. It is also known that he reused sections of one object for another with a different function, a practice consistent with the workshop tradition of the Veneto during the Renaissance. The shape of The Met’s container is rather curious and looks a bit like a sugar bowl. It has sometimes been interpreted as an inkstand, although most of the known inkwells of that period are smaller and have a rectangular shape. Perhaps it was intended as a container for sand. While one is in general suspicious of functional bronzes that do not conform to a certain pattern, the overall quality of this object speaks for a genuine creation of the Renaissance.
-CKG

Footnotes
(For key to shortened references see bibliography in Allen, Italian Renaissance and Baroque Bronzes in The Metropolitan Museum of Art. NY: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2022.)


1. Warren 2001a; Jestaz 2005.
2. See MMA, 1975.1.1396. For casts in the Ashmolean, National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., and on the art market (formerly Arenberg collection), see Warren 2014, pp. 200–201.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。