微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)赫拉克勒斯和翁法勒
品名(英)Hercules and Omphale
入馆年号1943年,43.100.33
策展部门欧洲雕塑和装饰艺术European Sculpture and Decorative Arts
创作者Vincennes Manufactory【1740 至 1756】【法国人】
创作年份公元 1744 - 公元 1754
创作地区
分类陶瓷-瓷器(Ceramics-Porcelain)
尺寸整体: (confirmed): 8 7/8 × 9 13/16 × 9 3/8 英寸 (22.5 × 24.9 × 23.8 厘米)
介绍(中)这个人物组描绘了希腊和罗马神话中的两个人物,赫拉克勒斯和奥姆法勒,[1]是文森斯工厂生产的最早的雕塑模型之一。虽然该型号首次出现在1752年的工厂库存中,但几乎可以肯定的是,它在1749年年中就已经投入生产。1749年7月12日,著名的巴黎商人拉扎雷·杜沃(法语:Lazare Duvaux,1703–1758)的账簿记录了将"一个巨大的圆形镀金青铜底座,用于文森瓷器制成的大力神"出售给一位维拉蒙先生。[2] 由于Vincennes工厂最近才尝试生产雕塑人物和群体,因此不太可能有另一种大力神模型可以参考Duvaux账簿中的这种注释。由于其规模和组成的复杂性,Hercules and Omphale对于一家成立于1740年但仅在1745-46年才真正开始生产的工厂来说是一件雄心勃勃的作品。

这种规模的雕塑团体对一家年轻工厂构成的技术挑战在两个主要人物的部分坍塌中尤为明显,由于在窑炉烧制过程中出现的问题,这两者都在显著程度上向后倾斜。人物形象下滑的一个结果是赫拉克勒斯狮子皮的头部被压缩,这是传说中英雄的主要特征之一。人物原始、直立、坐姿的变化略微改变了构图,引入了一种无意的语言元素。另一个重要的技术缺陷是在图背面附近的底座发现的大的烧制裂缝。这条裂缝一定是在第一次或饼干烧制时出现在窑中,在第二次或釉料烧制之前,填充了非常小的混合了釉料的烧制瓷器碎片;非常明显的修复表明,目标只是避免进一步的损坏,而不是掩盖缺陷,这可能超出了工厂目前的能力。工厂意识到,雕刻和烧制这样大小的群体会很困难,这一点通过使用安装在下面的大型支撑支架就可以明显看出。支架由与该组相同的粘土体制成,从底座的一侧延伸到另一侧,与人物的正面方向平行。尽管增加了这种支撑,但这一组的软浆瓷胎显然无法在烧制过程的某些方面取得圆满成功

有趣的是,该模型的另外两个已知示例都没有出现相同的技术问题。在撰写本文时,巴黎艺术市场上的这组作品[3]和国家美术馆Adrien Dubouché,Limoges,Citéde la Céramique的这组画作[4]中,人物的坐姿都是完全直立的,射击裂缝非常小。[5] 与目前的例子或巴黎的这组不同,利摩日组(库存编号ADL9866)安装了一个镀金的青铜三枝烛台,看起来是该人物的原型,该烛台可能曾经也有一个Duvaux账簿中引用的那种镀金青铜底座。烛台通过两个直立的圆柱形元素附着在瓷器人像上,这两个圆柱形元素被建模为在三个已知组的背面发现的部分镂空树干。因此,博物馆的团队很可能最初安装了类似的烛台,底座上钻的三个孔可能是为了固定镀金青铜底座。如果这些孔是在该组制成后不久形成的,[6]这表明本示例的技术缺陷并没有被认为是不美观的,从而导致其无法销售

神话中的人物在文森斯工厂早期的生产中是受欢迎的雕塑主题,选择赫拉克勒斯和奥姆法勒作为一个人物组可能是因为法国最成功的艺术家之一弗朗索瓦·勒莫因(1688-11737)的同一主题的画作取得了引人注目的成功。他的《大力神与奥姆法勒》(1724)于1725年在沙龙展出,几个月前发表在颇具影响力的文学杂志《法兰西美居》上的一首诗就已经成为灵感来源。[7] 洛朗·卡尔斯(法语:Laurent Cars,1699–1771)于1728年在勒莫因的画作[8]之后创作的版画进一步增加了勒莫因作品的受欢迎程度。弗朗索瓦·布彻(法语:François Boucher,1703-1770)为1731-34年创作的一幅画选择了相同的主题,尽管它从未以印刷品的形式复制过,但鲍彻的一幅构图不同的赫拉克勒和奥姆法勒的画被雕刻出来,从而被更广泛的观众所接受。[9]

赫拉克勒斯和奥姆法勒的所有作品,包括文森斯组合,都将两个人物之间的属性交换放在首位,这两个人物概括了这两位恋人的故事。在奥维德(Ovid)[10]和阿波洛多罗斯(Apolodorus)的叙述中,赫拉克勒斯(Hercules)被迫将自己卖为奴隶,以弥补他所犯下的谋杀罪。赫拉克勒斯被莉迪亚的王后奥姆法勒买下,既是她的奴隶,也是她的情人。奥姆法勒对赫拉克勒斯的统治是如此彻底,以至于有传言称他开始穿着女性服装,并采用女性追求,如编织。传统上,赫拉克勒斯被描绘成手持奥姆法勒的远端,用于纺纱生产线,而奥姆法勒则手持赫拉克勒斯的球杆,穿着他的狮子皮,这反映了她在这段关系中的权威。Vincennes组的建模师包括了这些属性,尽管在这幅构图中,两位恋人躺在大力神的狮子皮上,一个推杆握着纺锤。Lemoyne的画作被引用为Vincennes集团的组成来源,[12]无论是直接还是通过Cars的雕刻。尽管瓷器版本和Lemoyne的构图有明显的相似之处
介绍(英)This figure group depicting two figures from Greek and Roman mythology, Hercules and Omphale,[1] is one of the earliest sculptural models produced by the Vincennes factory. While the model first appears in the factory inventory of 1752, it seems almost certain that it was in production by the middle of 1749. On July 12, 1749, the account book of the famous Parisian marchand mercier Lazare Duvaux (French, 1703–1758) records the sale of “a large round gilt-bronze base for a Hercules made of Vincennes porcelain” to a Monsieur de Villaumont.[2] As the Vincennes factory had only recently attempted the production of sculptural figures and groups, it is unlikely that there was another model of Hercules to which this notation in Duvaux’s account book could refer. Due to its size and the complexity of its composition, Hercules and Omphale is a surprisingly ambitious work for a factory that was founded in 1740 yet began production in earnest only in the years 1745–46.

The technical challenges to a young factory posed by a sculptural group of this scale are especially evident in the partial collapse of the two primary figures, both of which lean backward to a notable degree because of a problem that occurred during the kiln firing. One result of the slumping of the figures is the compression of the head of Hercules’s lion skin, one of the legendary hero’s primary attributes. This change in the figures’ original, upright, seated positions slightly alters the composition, introducing an element of languor that was unintentional. Another significant technical flaw is apparent in the large firing crack found at the base near the back of the figure. This crack, which must have occurred in the kiln during the first or biscuit firing, was filled with very small crushed pieces of fired porcelain mixed with glaze prior to the second or glaze firing; the very visible repair suggests that the goal was simply to avert further damage rather than mask the defect, which was presumably beyond the factory’s ability at this point. The awareness at the factory that sculpting and firing a group of this size would prove difficult is evident by the use of a large supporting brace installed underneath. Made from the same clay body as the group, the brace runs from one side of the base to the other, parallel to the frontal orientation of the figures. Despite the addition of this support, the soft-paste porcelain body of this group was clearly incapable of with-standing some aspect of the firing process with complete success.

Interestingly, neither of the two other known examples of this model exhibits the same technical problems. In both the group on the Paris art market at the time of this writing[3] and the group in the Musée National Adrien Dubouché, Limoges, Cité de la Céramique,[4] the figures are fully upright in their seated positions, and the firing cracks are very minor.[5] Unlike the present example or the group in Paris, the Limoges group (inv. no. ADL9866) is mounted with a gilt-bronze, three-branch candelabrum that appears to be original to the figure, which may once also have had a gilt-bronze base of the type cited in Duvaux’s account book. The candelabrum attaches to the porcelain figure by means of the two upright cylindrical elements modeled as partially hollowed-out tree trunks found at the back of each of the three known groups. Thus, it is likely that the Museum’s group originally was mounted with a similar candelabrum, and the three holes drilled in the base may have been intended to secure a gilt-bronze base. If the holes were created shortly after the group was made,[6] it indicates that the technical shortcomings of the present example were not regarded as so disfiguring as to render it unsalable.

Figures from mythology were popular sculptural subjects for the Vincennes factory in its early years of production, and the choice of Hercules and Omphale for a figure group may have been prompted by the highly visible success of a painting of the same subject by one of France’s most successful artists, François Lemoyne (1688–1737). His Hercule et Omphale (1724) was exhibited in the Salon in 1725, having already served as inspiration for a poem published several months earlier in the Mercure de France, the influential literary journal.[7] A print executed by Laurent Cars (French, 1699–1771) in 1728,[8] after Lemoyne’s painting, further increased the popularity of Lemoyne’s composition. François Boucher (French, 1703–1770) chose the same subject matter for a painting executed in the years 1731–34, although it was never reproduced in print form, but Boucher’s drawing of a differently composed Hercule et Omphale was engraved and thus became available to a wider audience.[9]

All of the compositions of Hercules and Omphale, including the Vincennes group, give primacy to the exchange of attributes between the two figures that encapsulates the story of these two lovers. In the recountings by Ovid[10] and by Apollodorus,[11] Hercules was forced to sell himself into slavery to atone for a murder that he had committed. Purchased by the queen of Lydia, Omphale, Hercules served as both her slave and lover. Omphale’s domination of Hercules was so complete that he was rumored to have begun dressing in female attire and adopting female pursuits, such as weaving. Traditionally, Hercules is depicted holding Omphale’s distaff, used for spinning to produce thread, while Omphale holds Hercules’s club and wears his lion skin, reflecting her authority in the relationship. The modeler of the Vincennes group includes these attributes, although in this composition the two lovers rest on Hercules’s lion skin and a putto holds the spindle. Lemoyne’s painting has been cited as the source for the composition of the Vincennes group,[12] both directly and through the intermediary of Cars’s engraving. Even though there are distinct similarities between the porcelain version and Lemoyne’s composition, a number of differences exist as well, and it is difficult to determine if these differences are due to the inevitable changes required in transferring a two-dimensional image into three dimensions, or if a different source was employed at the factory. Whatever the inspiration might have been for this porcelain group, Hercules and Omphale reflects the intention at Vincennes to produce works that expanded the range of porcelain sculpture beyond anything that had been attempted in France prior to this time.


Footnotes
(For key to shortened references see bibliography in Munger, European Porcelain in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. NY: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2018)
1 Known in Roman mythology as Hercules, the famous hero of Antiquity, he was called Herakles by the Greeks.
2 “une grande terrasse ronde de bronze ciselé & doré d’or moulu pour un Hercule de porcelaine de Vincennes”; Courajod 1965, vol. 2, p. 25, no. 256 (entry of July 12, 1749).
3 Art Antiques London 2010, ill. p. 84.
4 Whitehead 1993, fig. 5.
5 The group in Limoges is known only through photographs and has not been examined by the author.
6 The glaze has chipped around the holes and no glaze is found within the holes, indicating that the holes were made after the final firing.
7 Bailey 1992, p. 244. Lemoyne’s painting of Hercules and Omphale is now in the Musée du Louvre, Paris (M.I. 1086).
8 Harvard University Art Museums, Cambridge, Mass. (Le Bl. 12).
9 Bailey 1992, p. 375.
10 Ovid, Fasti 2.303–30.
11 Apollodorus, The Library 2.6.3.
12 Eriksen and Bellaigue 1987, p. 196, pl. 7; Préaud and Albis 1991, p. 170, no. 168.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。