微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)海王星的胜利
品名(英)Triumph of Neptune
入馆年号1964年,64.101.1426
策展部门欧洲雕塑和装饰艺术European Sculpture and Decorative Arts
创作者Alvise of Padua【1426 至 1526】
创作年份公元 1510 - 公元 1530
创作地区
分类雕塑青铜(Sculpture-Bronze)
尺寸Diameter: 9 3/4 英寸 (24.8 厘米)
介绍(中)这幅圆环画中,一个没有胡须的海王星坐在一对海马拉着的船只上。海卫一站在齐膝深的海浪中,握着其中一个生物的缰绳,而左手拿着一个球状物体的涅瑞德则回头看了一眼。浮雕是实心铸造的,在其历史后期应用了整体深棕色铜绿。光滑的外边缘被四个孔刺穿,最初可能被框架覆盖。

这件青铜器是策展人伊冯娜·哈肯布罗赫(Yvonne Hackenbroch)的最爱,他首次将其发表在1962年的Untermyer收藏目录中,并于同年在《鉴赏家》杂志的一篇独立文章中发表。她将其置于十六世纪初的威尼斯-帕多安轨道内,注意到曼特尼亚的海神之战可能的影响,特别是海卫一和海马的预备图。[1]她将这位艺术家命名为"海王星胜利大师",并注意到其格式和与所谓的巴尔巴里戈浮雕大师的青铜器相似之处(见第55类)。

该作品至少存在于其他四个已知的铸件中,包括华盛顿特区国家美术馆的克雷斯收藏; 卢浮宫(图56a); 德诺阿耶收藏; 和私人收藏的矩形版本。2]它们表现出轻微的变化。例如,卢浮宫浮雕中的男性人物有胡须,其背景具有射线效果。尽管约翰·波普-轩尼诗认为克雷斯青铜器优于目前的铸件,但詹姆斯·大卫·德雷珀推翻了这一判断,声称其优于华盛顿和巴黎版本。事实上,裸体人物的流畅、有保证的造型和他们表达的敏感性表明了它的精致制作。

这些青铜器以前被描述为某个"帕多瓦的阿尔维斯"的方式,他在Anonimo Morelliano中被提及为收藏家和艺术家,以圆形浮雕而闻名。3]这位雕塑家的身份仍然模糊不清,在此期间,帕多瓦至少有三位金匠有这个名字。[4]青铜器可以更合理地与十六世纪第二个十年在威尼斯的安东尼奥·隆巴多的工作室联系起来。人物类型的古典主义与安东尼奥在1508年左右为阿方索一世德埃斯特创作的大理石浮雕密切相关。[5]海王星在青铜中的姿势遵循安东尼奥的雅典娜和波塞冬浮雕中右侧坐着的指向人物的姿势。同样,Nereid举起的手与火神锻造浮雕中左侧人物的手相呼应,这本身就是最近出土的Laocoön的引文。在海王星青铜和安东尼奥为费拉拉创作的大力神胜利大理石浮雕之间可以看到更正式和图像上的一致性,以及圣马可青铜旗杆上的浮雕,由亚历山德罗·莱奥帕尔迪签名,但令人信服地提出基于安东尼奥的模型。[6]应该强调的是,海王星的图像在文艺复兴早期很少,没有大型雕像从古代幸存下来。[7]这些青铜器,如安蒂科为吉安弗朗切斯科·冈萨加(约1487年;摩德纳的埃斯滕塞画廊)是神灵的重要早期表现形式,在他的肖像学通过文森佐·卡塔里(Vincenzo Cartari)的1571年《Le imagini de i dei de gli antichi》等作品变得更加标准化之前。

作为海神,海王星与威尼斯有关,这加强了这些青铜器起源地的可能性。这座城市的命运取决于其海上活动,正如雅各布·德·巴巴里(Jacopo de' Barbari)在1500年左右绘制的大型地图所示,其中肌肉发达的海王星从水中观察威尼斯。[8]浮雕的构图来源尚不清楚,尽管它可能来自古代石棺、凹雕或硬币,或广泛流传的描绘类似场景的尼罗版画(图 56b)。虽然青铜器的主题传统上被描述为海王星的胜利,但神在没有妻子安菲特里特在他身边的情况下显示。她可能是场景中左边的Nereid,她的恐怖表情和左手的物体,有时被描述为苹果,指向一个尚未识别的特定叙述。
-JF

脚注
(有关缩短参考文献的关键,请参阅大都会艺术博物馆艾伦、意大利文艺复兴和巴洛克青铜器的参考书目。纽约:大都会艺术博物馆,2022。


1. Untermyer 1962,第十七页,图。4.
2.NGA, 1957.14.429.关于德诺阿耶青铜器(前比肖夫斯海姆收藏),见吉罗1881年,第二十页。
3. 有关归属,请参阅 ESDA/OF。对于金匠阿尔维斯,见米歇尔 1888 年,第 32-33 页;动机2008,第67页。
4. Sartori 1976,第 247–48 页。
5. 现在在冬宫,Н.CK-1770、1771、1773。
6. 威科 1996;Ishii 2008,他在Antico和Antonio Lombardo的作品中概述了海马体。
7. 弗里德曼 1995.
8. 版画现藏于明尼阿波利斯艺术学院,2010.88。
介绍(英)This roundel shows a beardless Neptune seated atop a vessel being pulled by a pair of hippocamps. Standing knee-deep in the sea’s undulating waves, a Triton holds the reins of one of the creatures, while a Nereid, holding an orblike object in her left hand, glances back. The relief is solid-cast, with an overall dark brown patina applied later in its history. The smooth outer edge is pierced with four holes and was likely originally covered by a frame.

The bronze was a favorite of the curator Yvonne Hackenbroch, who first published it in the 1962 catalogue of the Untermyer collection and in a standalone article in The Connoisseur magazine the same year. Placing it within the Venetian-Paduan orbit of the early sixteenth century, she noted the likely influence of Mantegna’s Battle of the Sea Gods, in particular a preparatory drawing of Tritons and hippocamps.[1] She named the artist the Master of the Triumph of Neptune and noted similarities in its format and punched ground to bronzes by the so-called Master of the Barbarigo Reliefs (see cat. 55).

The composition exists in at least four other known casts, including those in the Kress Collection, National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.; the Louvre (fig. 56a); the De Noailles collection; and a rectangular version in a private collection.[2] They exhibit slight variations. For example, the male figures in the Louvre relief have beards, and its background has a rayed effect. Though John Pope-Hennessy considered the Kress bronze superior to the present cast, James David Draper reversed this judgment, asserting its superiority over the Washington and Paris versions. Indeed, the smooth, assured modeling of the nude figures and the sensitivity of their expressions point to its refined production.

The bronzes were previously described as in the manner of a certain “Alvise of Padua,” who is mentioned in the Anonimo Morelliano as a collector and artist known for reliefs in the round.[3] This sculptor’s identity remains cloudy, and there are at least three goldsmiths with that name documented in Padua during this period.[4] The bronze can be more reasonably associated with the workshop of Antonio Lombardo in Venice during the second decade of the sixteenth century. The classicism of the figure types aligns closely with that of Antonio’s marble reliefs executed around 1508 for Alfonso I d’Este.[5] Neptune’s pose in the bronze follows that of the seated pointing figure at the right in Antonio’s Athena and Poseidon relief. Similarly, the raised hand of the Nereid echoes that of the figure to the left in the Forge of Vulcan relief, itself a quotation of the recently unearthed Laocoön. More formal and iconographic concordances can be seen between the Neptune bronze and Antonio’s Triumph of Hercules marble relief for Ferrara, as well as the reliefs on the bronze flagpoles in San Marco, signed by Alessandro Leopardi but convincingly proposed to be based on models by Antonio.[6] It should be stressed that Neptune imagery was scarce during the early Renaissance, with no large-scale statues surviving from antiquity.[7] These bronzes, like Antico’s Triumph of Neptune relief on his urn for Gianfrancesco Gonzaga (ca. 1487; Galleria Estense, Modena), are important early representations of the deity before his iconography became more standardized through writings like Vincenzo Cartari’s 1571 Le imagini de i dei de gli antichi.

As the god of the sea, Neptune was linked to Venice, which reinforces the likelihood of its place of origin for these bronzes. The city’s fortunes depended on its maritime activities, as illustrated in Jacopo de’ Barbari’s large-scale map of around 1500, in which a muscular Neptune surveys Venice from the water.[8] The relief’s compositional source is unknown, though it likely derives from ancient sarcophagi, intaglios, or coins, or the widely circulated niello prints that depict a similar scene (fig. 56b). While the subject of the bronze is traditionally described as a Triumph of Neptune, the god is shown without his wife Amphitrite at his side. She may be the Nereid at left in the scene, whose expression of horror and the object in her left hand, sometimes described as an apple, point to a specific as-yet-unidentified narrative.
-JF

Footnotes
(For key to shortened references see bibliography in Allen, Italian Renaissance and Baroque Bronzes in The Metropolitan Museum of Art. NY: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2022.)


1. Untermyer 1962, p. xvii, fig. 4.
2. NGA, 1957.14.429. For the De Noailles bronze (ex-Bischoffsheim collection), see Giraud 1881, pl. XX.
3. For the attribution, see ESDA/OF. For the goldsmith Alvise, see Michiel 1888, pp. 32–33; Motture 2008, p. 67.
4. Sartori 1976, pp. 247–48.
5. Now at the Hermitage, Н.CK-1770, 1771, 1773.
6. Wolters 1996; Ishii 2008, who provides an overview of hippocamps in works by Antico and Antonio Lombardo.
7. Freedman 1995.
8. A print is in the Minneapolis Institute of Art, 2010.88.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。