微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)绑架Sabine
品名(英)Abduction of a Sabine
入馆年号1970年,1970.315
策展部门欧洲雕塑和装饰艺术European Sculpture and Decorative Arts
创作者Giambologna【1529 至 1608】【荷兰人】
创作年份公元 1700 - 公元 1799
创作地区
分类雕塑青铜(Sculpture-Bronze)
尺寸整体 (confirmed): 23 1/4 × 9 1/8 × 10 3/8 英寸 (59.1 × 23.2 × 26.4 厘米)
介绍(中)这组青铜器是詹博洛尼亚大理石绑架萨宾的缩小版,于 1582 年 8 月安装在佛罗伦萨领主广场的凉廊 dei Lanzi 中,并于 1583 年 1 月正式揭幕。这枚青铜器于1970年作为欧文·昂特迈尔(Irwin Untermyer)的礼物进入大都会博物馆,后者于1969年以16,000美元的价格收购了它。[1] 詹姆斯·大卫·德雷珀(James David Draper)于1977年将其作为"乔瓦尼·博洛尼亚之后"出版,并将其与其他更好的大理石还原进行了有利的比较。实际上,我们的绑架在很多方面都偏离了大型雕塑。例如,它具有不同的岩石底座,在女人的头发上增加了一个精致的王冠,所有三个人物的眼睛都用瞳孔和虹膜切开(只有女人的眼睛在大理石中铰接)。

Giambologna广受赞誉的大理石组有许多已知的还原,每个还原都适应了不同的尺寸,其日期从16世纪末到19世纪末不等。2] Claudia Kryza-Gersch和Dimitrios Zikos已经确定了一个数字,它们共享一个金色的黄褐色铜绿,对应于Giambologna工作室及其直接追随者(首先是Antonio Susini)的做法。[3]在艺术家的一生中以及他于1608年去世后的几年里,开始收集副本。早在 1609 年,威尔士亲王亨利就表达了他希望获得灰泥微型版本的愿望。[4]最早的青铜铸件记录是在1607-11年鲁道夫二世皇帝的Kunstkammer的清单中发现的。第二幅被列为马库斯·扎赫(Markus Zäch)于1610年拥有的财产,以及大师的大量作品(例如,见第126类)。Zikos确定Zäch青铜器是2014年在佳士得拍卖的青铜器。[5]《绑架》是一部品质非凡、造型精湛的演员阵容,是一部亲笔签名作品。[6]至于年代测定,1587年的终点是眼睛的关节,这是该日期之后在Giambologna工作室生产的青铜器的共同处理方法。Zikos进一步认为,佳士得的青铜器来自大理石组的准备研究,这一起源可以解释它们之间的差异。值得注意的是,这些差异——底座、眼睛、王冠——也存在于大都会的青铜器中。

佳士得和大都会的组高均为59厘米,大致相当于"braccio fiorentino"(约58厘米)。在他 1688 年的詹博洛尼亚传记中,菲利波·巴尔迪努奇在他的模特中列出了"il gruppo delle Sabine alto circa un braccio fiorentino"(萨宾人群体一个布拉西奥高);他还提到了乔瓦尼·弗朗切斯科·苏西尼(Giovanni Francesco Susini)铸造的Giambolognesque模型中的绑架组,证明了大师原始设计的耐用性,直到17世纪。[7]正如德雷珀所讨论的那样,不那么明亮的饰面,黑色的铜绿,以及细节的简化,如女人的辫子,指向我们的绑架是后来的演员,源自杰出的茎法典,可能起源于亲笔签名佳士得的青铜。即使是通过检查底部和射线照相确定的事实,也表明它可以追溯到十八世纪。这三个人物似乎是分别铸造和完成的,然后与额外的熔融金属浇注结合在一起,这种技术在马西米利亚诺·索尔达尼(Massimiliano Soldani)的作品之前并不常见(见第145类)。[8]
-TM

脚注
(有关缩短参考文献的关键,请参阅大都会艺术博物馆的艾伦、意大利文艺复兴和巴洛克青铜器的参考书目。纽约:大都会艺术博物馆,2022。


1. 给欧文·昂特迈尔的发票,1969 年 2 月 26 日,ESDA/OF。Untermyer在同一天购买了另一件Giambolognesque青铜器(第138类)的事实表明,这次收购是通过同一经销商进行的。
2. 这一系列作品的一致性在十八和十九世纪的拍卖目录中得到了充分的证明。
3. 其中包括:巴伐利亚国家博物馆,慕尼黑,52/118;希尔收藏(Wengraf 2014,第 148-57 页);列支敦士登王室收藏,维也纳,SK115(Kugel 2008,第90页,第8号);前赫恩收藏,2007年6月21日在苏黎世科勒拍卖,拍品编号1008。
4. 沃森和艾弗里 1973,第 498 页。
5. 佳士得,伦敦,2014年7月10日,编号30(附齐科斯的文章)。6. 签名
GIO BOLONGE(刻在蜡上)与其他詹博洛尼亚青铜器上的签名一致,例如维也纳的天文学(第 00 页,图 126a)和波士顿美术博物馆的建筑,40.23。
7. 巴尔迪努奇 1845-47,第 2 卷,第 583 页和第 4 卷,第 118 页。
8. 见 R. Stone/TR,2011 年 6 月 30 日。这个日期也适合辛辛那提艺术博物馆(1975.47)的铸件,该博物馆具有相似的铜绿,并具有大都会青铜器的尺寸和独特特征(王冠,切开的虹膜)。
9. R. Stone/ TR,2011 年 6 月 30 日
介绍(英)This bronze group is a reduction of Giambologna’s marble Abduction of a Sabine, installed in the Loggia dei Lanzi in Piazza della Signoria, Florence, in August 1582 and officially unveiled in January 1583. The bronze entered The Met in 1970 as a gift from Irwin Untermyer, who had acquired it in 1969 for the sum of $16,000.[1] James David Draper published it in 1977 as “after Giovanni Bologna” and compared it favorably to other, better reductions of the marble. In reality, our Abduction deviates in significant respects from the large sculpture. For example, it features a different rocky base, the addition of an elaborate diadem in the woman’s hair, and the eyes of all three figures are incised with pupils and irises (only the woman’s eyes are articulated in the marble).

There are many known reductions of Giambologna’s acclaimed marble group, each adapted to varying dimensions and ranging in date from the late sixteenth century to the end of the nineteenth century.[2] Claudia Kryza-Gersch and Dimitrios Zikos have identified a number that share a golden tawny patina corresponding to the practices of Giambologna’s workshop and his direct followers (first and foremost, Antonio Susini).[3] Copies began to be collected during the artist’s lifetime and in the years immediately following his death in 1608. Already in 1609, Henry, prince of Wales, communicated his desire to receive a miniature version in stucco.[4] The earliest record of a bronze cast is found in the 1607–11 inventories of Emperor Rudolf II’s Kunstkammer. The second is listed among the possessions of Markus Zäch in 1610, together with a substantial series of the master’s works (see, e.g., cat. 126). Zikos identified the Zäch bronze as the one auctioned at Christie’s in 2014.[5] That Abduction, a cast of exceptional quality with exquisite modeling, is an autograph work.[6] As for dating, a terminus post quem of 1587 is provided by the articulation of the eyes, a treatment common to bronzes produced in Giambologna’s workshop after that date. Zikos further suggests that the Christie’s bronze derives from preparatory studies for the marble group, a genesis that would explain the differences between them. Significantly, these differences—base, eyes, diadem—are also found in The Met’s bronze.

Both the Christie’s and Met groups measure 59 cm in height, which roughly corresponds to the “braccio fiorentino” (ca. 58 cm). In his 1688 biography of Giambologna, Filippo Baldinucci lists among his models “il gruppo delle Sabine alto circa un braccio fiorentino” (the group of the Sabines a braccio tall); he also mentions the Abduction group among the Giambolognesque models cast by Giovanni Francesco Susini, attesting to the durability of the master’s original design well into the seventeenth century.[7] The less brilliant finish, as Draper discussed, the blackish patina, and the simplification of details such as the woman’s braid point to our Abduction being a later cast derived from the illustrious stemma codicum that probably originated in the autograph Christie’s bronze. Even its facture, determined by examining the underside and through radiography, suggests that it dates to the eighteenth century. The three figures appear to have been cast and finished separately before joining with additional pours of molten metal, a technique not common until the work of Massimiliano Soldani (see cat. 145).[8]
-TM

Footnotes
(For key to shortened references see bibliography in Allen, Italian Renaissance and Baroque Bronzes in The Metropolitan Museum of Art. NY: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2022.)


1. Invoice to Irwin Untermyer, February 26, 1969, ESDA/OF. The fact that Untermyer bought another Giambolognesque bronze (cat. 138) the same day suggests that this acquisition was made through the same dealer.
2. The consistency of this body of work is demonstrated abundantly in auction catalogues in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
3. These include: Bayerische Nationalmuseum, Munich, 52/118; Hill collection (Wengraf 2014, pp. 148–57); Princely Collections of Liechtenstein, Vienna, SK115 (Kugel 2008, p. 90, no. 8); ex-Hearn collection, auctioned at Koller, Zurich, June 21, 2007, lot 1008.
4. Watson and Avery 1973, p. 498.
5. Christie’s, London, July 10, 2014, lot 30 (with an essay by Zikos).
6. The signature, GIO BOLONGE (inscribed in the wax), is consistent with those found on other Giambologna bronzes, for example, the Astronomy in Vienna (p. 00, fig. 126a) and the Architecture, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, 40.23.
7. Baldinucci 1845–47, vol. 2, p. 583, and vol. 4, p. 118.
8. See R. Stone/TR, June 30, 2011. This date would also be appropriate for the cast in the Cincinnati Art Museum (1975.47), which has a similar patina and shares the dimensions and distinctive features (diadem, incised irises) of The Met’s bronze.
9. R. Stone/ TR, June 30, 2011
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。