微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)磁盘装饰
品名(英)Disk Ornament
入馆年号1987年,1987.394.231
策展部门迈克尔·洛克菲勒之翼The Michael C. Rockefeller Wing
创作者
创作年份公元 600 - 公元 1533
创作地区厄瓜多尔沿海地区(Coastal Ecuador)
分类金属装饰品(Metal-Ornaments)
尺寸直径7 1/8 英寸 (18 厘米)
介绍(中)技术说明:2017年进行的光学显微镜和XRF


这个金属盘,可能是胸脯,属于Verneau和Rivet(1912年、299年至306年)以及Jijón y Caamaño(1920年)描述的通常被称为tincullpas的人工制品的主体。这个圆盘显示了一张哺乳动物的脸,中央有高浮雕,外面有平坦的未装饰的边缘。虽然这些面孔往往被认为是猫科动物(见Ugalde 2009),但Rodríguez(1992,82-83)已经引起了人们对某些特征的关注,这些特征是kinkajou(Potos flavus)的标志。在这种情况下,脸包括两个半圆形的眼睛,一个鼻梁从眼睛上方开始的鼻子,以及一个有四颗牙齿的矩形嘴。两个中央牙齿有穿孔,这可能固定了一个用订书钉固定的可移动的长舌头(参见Jijón y Caamaño 1920,第6页,第5号)。磁盘顶部附近还有两个孔,可能是用来悬挂的

圆盘是用锤击过的薄板制成的,经过repossé加工,然后在正面镀金。板材通过反复的锤击和退火循环进行加工硬化。为了制作现在的圆盘,金属铁匠将薄板锤到圆盘的当前厚度。为了形成哺乳动物头部的中心设计,铁匠可能将圆盘放在一个刚性的形状上,并从反面加工薄片,使其下沉为中心半球形。面部的细节是用金属或骨头冲压完成的。在完成重新设计后,史密斯开始对椎间盘进行穿孔。他们从正面钻了两个顶部的洞(见图2),而从反面钻了哺乳动物牙齿上的两个洞(见图3)

镀金仅应用于该圆盘的正面,可能采用了一种称为熔融或冲洗镀金的方法。边缘和反面未进行任何加工。这种技术是在厄瓜多尔和哥伦比亚南部纳里尼奥地区发现的黄金作品的特征,在秘鲁北部也偶尔发现(见Scott 2011)。在表面上涂上一层熔融的金铜合金,然后再加热到高温,然后进行耗尽镀金以从表面去除铜,并锤击以产生光滑度

目前,镀金层是有斑点和不完整的,在埋藏过程中,由于铜的腐蚀和随后的清洁去除,镀金层发生了变化。这与埋藏过程中包裹在圆盘上的纺织品有关,在剩余的镀金中可以看到纺织品的编织图案(见图4)

一项早期调查(Jijón y Caamaño 1920)报告称,在Alchipichí遗址发现了这些特殊的圆盘,在一座坟墓的单个容器中发现了36个。随着时间的推移,很明显,这些圆盘是在更广泛的地理范围内沉积和描绘在其他媒体上的,主要与Manteño Huancavilca传统(公元600-1533年)有关(Gutiérrez 20022011;Lleras 2015)。Alchipichí墓中存放的圆盘可能是从沿海地区进口的(个人通讯,María del Carmen Molestina,2017)。这些圆盘的一些已发表的例子(Verneau和Rivet 1912,第24页,第16号;Jijón y Caamaño 1920,第1页,第2页)与目前的圆盘非常相似,因为它们的总体设计,特别是它们的D形眼睛。后一项研究包括通过沉淀反应进行的成分分析,表明胸肌主要是铜,含有微量铁和铅。在Ministerio de Cultura(基多)收藏的几种胸肌中,有一种直径21.4厘米,与目前的椎间盘设计相似,但具有圆形眼睛,似乎没有穿孔(Lleras 2015)。[1] 美国印第安人国家博物馆收藏了其他类似的圆盘,这些圆盘是从一系列沿海和内陆环境中发现的(01/0607来自马纳比;01/5693来自埃斯梅拉达斯;21/4489来自钦博拉佐)。其中一个来自通古拉胡的Hacienda Carbón(NMAI 19/4865)(见图6),另一个来自基多附近的Pomasqui(Jijón y Caamaño 1920,第6页,第5页),显示了一条单独的金属带,通过口腔穿孔附着在椎间盘上,这是该语料库的一个常见特征。在每种情况下,条带都部分延伸到胸肌边缘之外。在前一种情况下,订书钉穿过口腔中的穿孔和单独条带中的穿孔,将两片固定在一起。条状物代表哺乳动物的舌头。当椎间盘附着在人的胸部时,当人移动时,或者当有风时,舌头会移动,撞击椎间盘并发出声音

值得注意的是,在其他媒体上也有对这些圆盘的描绘,有哺乳动物或猫科动物的脸,如古铁雷斯(2011,150–51)所说的Jama Coaque陶瓷人物,描绘萨满、舞者和战士,以及塞罗·贾本奇洛(Saville 1907–10,第二十七页,第1号)的石座。Jama Coaque金属胸脯(例如,Gutiérrez 2011,图50b、c、d),以及达拉斯艺术博物馆的一个胸脯(1983.6.FA),虽然在其中心展示了一张哺乳动物的脸,并且是通过锤击和重新冲压制成的,但与现在的圆盘截然不同,即Verneau和Rivet(1912年,第24页,第16号)中展示的Riobamba圆盘,以及在Jijón y Caamaño(1920)中展示的Alchipichí和Pomasqui的许多例子。区别最为明显的是,前者被装饰在它们的边界周围,填满了哺乳动物头部周围的空间,它们的报告工作要全面得多。事实上,前者的眼睛是圆形的,而后者的眼睛通常是闭合的半圆。另一个圆盘没有穿孔,属于Manteño传统,显示了一个浮雕的哺乳动物头部(有圆形眼睛),但要小得多(直径约3厘米),没有穿孔,哺乳动物面部周围没有装饰(Centro Cultural Libertador Simón Bolívar(Gu
介绍(英)Technical note: Optical microscopy and XRF conducted in 2017.


This metal disk, possibly a pectoral, belongs to the corpus of artifacts often referred to as tincullpas described by Verneau and Rivet (1912, 299–306) and Jijón y Caamaño (1920). This disk shows a mammalian face in high relief at its center and flat undecorated edges around the outside. While these faces tend to be identified as feline (see Ugalde 2009), Rodríguez (1992, 82–83) has drawn attention to certain features as indicators of a kinkajou (Potos flavus). In this case, the face includes two semi-circular eyes, a nose whose bridge begins above the eyes, and a rectangular mouth with four teeth. The two central teeth have perforations, which may have secured a long movable tongue attached with staples (cf. Jijón y Caamaño 1920, pl. 6, no. 5). There are two more holes, perhaps for suspension near the top of the disk.

The disk was made from hammered sheet, worked by repoussé and then gilded on the obverse. The sheet is work-hardened by repeated cycles of hammering and annealing. To create the present disk, metalsmiths hammered sheet to the current thickness of the disk. To form the central design of the mammal’s head, the smith may have rested the disk on a rigid form and worked the sheet from the reverse side to sink the central hemispherical shape. The details of the face were created with repoussé accomplished with a metal or bone punch. After completing the repoussé design, the smith undertook perforating the disk. They perforated the two top holes from the obverse (see image 2), while they perforated the two holes in the mammal’s teeth from the reverse (see image 3).

The gilding was applied only to the obverse side of this disk probably by a method known as fusion or wash gilding. The edges and the reverse surface were left ungilded. This technique, characteristic of gold work found in Ecuador and Southern Colombia in the Nariño region, has also been found occasionally in northern Peru (see Scott 2011). A layer of molten gold-copper alloy was applied on the surface and then re-heated to a high temperature, followed by depletion gilding to remove copper from the surface and hammering to create smoothness.

At present, the gilding layer is spotty and incomplete, having been altered during burial by corrosion of the copper and subsequent cleaning to remove it. This occurred in conjunction with a textile that had been wrapped around the disk during burial, leaving the textile’s weave pattern visible in the remaining gilding (see image 4).

An early investigation (Jijón y Caamaño 1920) reported finds of these particular disks from the site of Alchipichí, where 36 were found in a single vessel in a tomb. Over time, it has become clear that the disks were deposited—and depicted in other media—over a wider geography, mainly associated with the Manteño Huancavilca tradition (A.D. 600-1533) (Gutiérrez 2002, 2011; Lleras 2015). The disks deposited in the Alchipichí tomb may have been imported from coastal sites (personal communication, María del Carmen Molestina, 2017). Some published examples of these disks (Verneau and Rivet 1912, pl. 24, no. 16; Jijón y Caamaño 1920, pls. 1, 2) are quite similar to the present disk for their general design and specifically for their D-shaped eyes. The latter study included compositional analysis, through precipitation reactions, that showed the pectorals to be predominantly copper with trace amounts of iron and lead. One of several such pectorals in the collections of the Ministerio de Cultura (Quito), 21.4 cm in diameter, shows a similar design to the present disk, but features circular eyes and appears to lack perforations (Lleras 2015).[1] Other analogous disks are in the collections of the National Museum of the American Indian and were recovered from a range of coastal and inland contexts (01/0607 from Manabí; 01/5693 from Esmeraldas; 21/4489 from Chimborazo). One from Hacienda Carbón, Tungurahu (NMAI 19/4865) (see image 6) along with one from Pomasqui, near Quito (Jijón y Caamaño 1920, pl. 6, no. 5) show a separate strip of metal that is attached to the disk through the perforations in the mouth that are a common feature of this corpus. The strip in each case extends partially beyond the edge of the pectoral. In the former case, a staple runs through the perforations in the mouth and those in the separate strip, securing the pieces to one another. The strip represents the tongue of the mammal. With the disk attached to a person’s chest, the tongue would have moved when the person moved, or when there was wind, striking the disk and producing a sound.

Notably there are depictions of these disks, with mammal or feline faces, in other media, such as on Jama Coaque ceramic figures depicting shamans, dancers, and a warrior according to Gutiérrez (2011, 150–51) and on a stone seat from Cerro Jaboncillo (Saville 1907–10, pl. XXVII, no. 1). The Jama Coaque metal pectorals (e.g., Gutiérrez 2011, fig. 50b,c,d), along with one in the Dallas Museum of Art (1983.6.FA), while showing a mammal face at their center, and having been fabricated through hammering and repoussé, are quite distinct from the present disk, the disk from Riobamba shown in Verneau and Rivet (1912, pl. 24, no. 16), and numerous examples from Alchipichí and Pomasqui shown in Jijón y Caamaño (1920). The distinction is clearest in the fact that the former are decorated around their borders, filling up the space around the mammal’s head, and their repoussé work is far more rounded. Indeed, the mammal’s eyes of the former group are circular with those of the latter are usually closed semi-circles. Another disk, without perforations, and ascribed to the Manteño tradition, shows an embossed mammal head (with circular eyes), but is much smaller (about 3 cm in diameter), has no perforations, and lacks decoration around the mammal face (Centro Cultural Libertador Simón Bolívar (Guayaquil) (CCLSB) GA-1-2827-85).[2]

The name tincullpa may be an alteration of tincurpa, which was recorded by the Spanish missionary Pablo José Arriaga (1621) in Peru for metal plates or clasps; it is a Quechua term and also has been applied to describe ear pendants that look similar to the pectorals. While there is early evidence for the use, but not production, of metal on the Ecuadorian coast at sites like Salango (ca. 1500 B.C.) (Hosler 1994, 106), much of the Manteño Huancavilca metalworking tradition—in which hammering, chiseling, embossing, and the production of gilded copper are common—has been defined through the excavation of metal objects from the Ayalán cemetery whose dates, through radiocarbon analysis, extend from A.D. 700 to A.D. 1700 (Lleras 2015; Ubelaker 1981). Copper sources only exist in the inland Sierra, while people in more coastal regions may have acquired gold, which is also found in the Sierra, from alluvial deposits that formed in rivers emanating from the Sierra (Lleras 2015). At present, the Huancavilca community or pueblo consists, according to the Consejo de Desarrollo de las Nacionalidades y Pueblos del Ecuador, of 100,000 persons living in the Santa Elena Peninsula. For more information on the Huancavilca community, its history and present, please see Álvarez 1999.

Bryan Cockrell, Curatorial Fellow, Arts of Africa, Oceania and the Americas, 2017
Beth Edelstein, Associate Conservator, Objects Conservation
Ellen Howe, Conservator Emerita, Objects Conservation
Caitlin Mahony, Assistant Conservator, Objects Conservation

[1] The Ministerio de Cultura currently holds the collections of the Museo Nacional de Quito.
[2] The CCLSB is the former Museo Antropológico y de Arte Contemporáneo.

Related objects: 1979.206.510, 1987.394.232, 1980.83.15, 1987.394.233, 1995.427

References

Álvarez, Silvia. De Huancavilcas a comuneros: Relaciones interétnicas en la Península de Santa Elena, Ecuador. Quito: Abya Yala, 1999.

Gutiérrez Usilos, Andrés. Dioses, símbolos y alimentación en los Andes. Quito: Abya Yala, 2002.

-----. El eje del universo: Chamanes, sacerdotes y religiosidad en la cultura Jama Coaque del Ecuador Prehispánico. Madrid: Ministerio de Cultura, 2011.

Hosler, Dorothy. The Sounds and Colors of Power. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1994.

Jijón y Caamaño, Jacinto. "Los tincullpas y notas acerca de la metalurgia de los aborígenes del Ecuador." Boletín de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana 1, no. 1 (1920): 4-43.

Lleras Pérez, Roberto. Metallurgy in Ancient Ecuador. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2015.


Rodríguez Bastidas, Edgar Emilio. Fauna precolombina de Nariño. Santafé de Bogotá: Fundación de Investigaciones Arqueológicas Nacionales (Banco de la República), Instituto Colombiano de Antropología, 1992.

Saville, Marshall Howard. The Antiquities of Manabi, Ecuador. New York, Irving Press, 1907-1910.

Scott, David A. "The La Tolita-Tumaco Culture: Master Metalsmiths in Gold and Platinum." Latin American Antiquity 22, no. 1 (2011): 65-95.

Ubelaker, Douglas H. The Ayalán Cemetery: A Late Integration Period Burial Site on the South Coast of Ecuador. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution, 1981.

Ugalde, María Fernanda. Iconografía de la cultura Tolita: Lecturas del discurso ideológico en las representaciones figurativas del Desarrollo Regional. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 2009.

Verneau, René and Paul Rivet. Ethnographie ancienne de l’Equateur. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1912.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。