微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)胡子人物胸像
品名(英)Bust of a Bearded Figure
入馆年号1906年,06.1051.9
策展部门绘画和印刷品Drawings and Prints
创作者Andrea Solario【1465 至 1524】【意大利人】
创作年份公元 1515 - 公元 1524
创作地区
分类图画(Drawings)
尺寸页: 14 3/4 x 10 3/4 英寸 (37.5 x 27.3 厘米)
介绍(中)尽管1945年威廉·绥达(Wilhelm Suida)首次确认了大都会博物馆(Metropolitan Museum)对安德烈亚·索拉里奥(Andrea Solario)画作的正确归属,并于1966年得到路易莎·科吉亚蒂·阿拉诺(Luisa Cogliati Arano)的认可,但它也经常被错误地发表为贝尔纳丁·路易尼(Bernardino Luini)(根据雅各布·比恩(Jacob Bean)1982年的说法),以及1956年的高登齐奥·法拉利(Martin Weinberger,与大都会艺术博物馆馆长Claus Virch的口头交流)。大都会的研究与索拉里奥的《圣母升天》(Sagestia Nuova,Certosa of Pavia)中,站在最右边的留着胡须的使徒的设计非常密切,他指向空的石棺,正如大卫·艾伦·布朗(David Alan Brown)首次正确指出的那样。(参见Brown 1987,第287-89页,第74、77号。)然而,在本作者看来,最近人们对帕维亚祭坛画的这种联系感到怀疑,而且过于草率(参见Linda Wolk Simon在展览目录中的作品,大都会艺术博物馆和克雷莫纳,2003年和2004年)。瓦萨里的作品《圣母升天》(1550年和1568年版)中提到的索拉里奥的唯一作品——帕维亚祭坛画,在1524年8月这位艺术家去世时还未完成;根据拉莫1584年的记述(1774年重印),它是由贝纳迪诺·坎皮于1576年完成的。(参见Brown 1987,第287-88页,第77页。)与帕维亚祭坛画相关的还有两张用黑色粉笔和刷子和棕色水洗的侧翼设计研究,每一张都代表着三位使徒(巴黎卢浮宫博物馆10191和10191之二)。(参见Béguin,1985年,第90-91页,第53号;Brown 1987年,第288-89页,第75、76号。)

最近的科学检查(Rachel Mustalish,《纸保护》,大都会艺术博物馆;2005年11月22日)澄清了关于这幅画的彩色粉笔技术及其修复程度的一些问题,以及更明确地记录了纸张上存在米兰水印;它与索拉里奥的《基督背十字架》(Albertina inv.18817,维也纳;见Brown 1987,第286-87289页,第73、77号)中的相同。人物右手放在胸前的设计(很快就在纸的左下方画出了草图)是在干粉笔层上用画笔和铁胆墨水绘制的,可能是后来对人物姿势的修改,但很可能是由艺术家自己完成的,因为它被自信地描绘出来。索拉里奥研究中的水印也与乔瓦尼·安东尼奥·博尔特拉菲奥(Giovanni Antonio Boltrafio)的《一个女人的肖像》(Biblioteca Pinacoteca Ambrosiana Cod.F.290 inf.7,米兰)非常相似,这是一幅独立的作品,尽管这幅画的设计反映了1502年为s.Maria presso s.Satiro委托创作的圣巴巴拉祭坛画(Gemäldegalerie Staatliche Museum,柏林);Solario和Boltrafio的两幅作品也是用极为相似的彩色粉笔绘制的,但Solario的这幅作品被大大修复了。2003年,在大都会艺术博物馆的莱昂纳多展览中,当索拉里奥的《胡子男人》与波尔特拉菲奥的两幅著名肖像画(另见《青年肖像》,安布罗西阿纳·科德·F·290 inf.8)一起展出时,这些比较强调了这三件作品在风格和绘画技巧上的巨大相似性(参见《大都会艺术博物馆》2003年,第655-59页,第127-28号)。这就增加了一种可能性,即这三幅画的年代最终可能不会不同。考虑到博尔特拉菲奥于1516年去世,索拉里奥于1524年去世,而索拉里奥的绘画日期为1515-24年,这可能是合理的,但如果索拉里奥的帕维亚祭坛画的委员会文件被发现,这一日期可能会被修改


彩色粉笔的创新使用可能表明,大都会绘画虽然被用作帕维亚祭坛画中左侧使徒的原型,但也可能是为了独立功能而重新设计的:左下角的手的重新设计是用铁胆墨水而不是粉笔,将强烈主张在不同的背景下重复使用图形的设计。一个类似的例子可能是博尔特拉菲奥在安布罗西安娜(Ambrosiana)的粉彩肖像(见上图),这是基于1502年圣芭芭拉祭坛画中的人物,现在在柏林。这里彩色粉笔技术的使用与莱昂纳多和他最亲近的学生的实践密切相关,几十年后,其他艺术家才开始广泛使用这种媒介。(见麦格拉斯,1994年;托马斯·麦格拉斯,"意大利文艺复兴绘画中的色彩:意大利中部和威尼斯的理论与实践协调",阿波罗,第146卷,第429号(1997年11月),第22-30页;Thomas Mc Grath,"费德里科·巴洛奇和意大利中部帕斯泰利的历史",阿波罗,第148卷,第441号(1998年11月),第3-9页。
(Carmen C.Bambach;2006年3月24日)
介绍(英)Although the correct attribution of the Metropolitan Museum drawing to Andrea Solario was first recognized by Wilhelm Suida in 1945, and was endorsed by Luisa Cogliati Arano in 1966, it was also often wrongly published as by Bernardino Luini (according to Jacob Bean in 1982), and as Gaudenzio Ferrari in 1956 (Martin Weinberger, oral communication to Claus Virch, curator, The Metropolitan Museum of Art). The Metropolitan study is very closely related to the design of the bearded apostle standing on the extreme right, who points at the empty sarcophagus, in Solario's Assumption of the Virgin (Sagrestia Nuova, Certosa of Pavia), as was first rightly noted by David Alan Brown. (See Brown 1987, pp. 287-89, nos. 74, 77.) This connection to the Pavia altarpiece was recently doubted, however, and too hastily, in the present author's opinion (see Linda Wolk-Simon in the exhibition catalogues, The Metropolitan Museum of Art and Cremona, 2003 and 2004). The Pavia altarpiece of the Assumption, the only work by Solario mentioned in Vasari's Vite (1550 and 1568 editions), was left unfinished at the time of the artist's death in August 1524; according to Lamo's account of 1584 (reprinted in 1774), it was completed by Bernardino Campi, in 1576. (See Brown 1987, pp. 287-88, no. 77.) Also related to the Pavia altarpiece are two sheets of studies in black chalk with brush and brown wash for the designs of the side wings, each of which represents a group of three apostles (Musée du Louvre 10191 and 10191 bis, Paris). (See Béguin, 1985, pp. 90-91, no. 53; Brown 1987, pp. 288-89, nos. 75, 76.)

The most recent scientific examination (Rachel Mustalish, Paper Conservation, The Metropolitan Museum of Art; November 22, 2005) has clarified some of the questions regarding the colored chalk technique of this drawing and the extent of its restoration, as well as has more definitively documented the presence of a Milanese watermark on the paper; it is identical to that in Solario's drawing of Christ Carrying the Cross (Albertina inv. 18817, Vienna; see Brown 1987, pp. 286-87, 289, nos. 73, 77). The design for the figure's right hand placed on the chest (it is very quickly sketched at the lower left of the sheet) is an addition in brush and iron gall ink, drawn on top of the dry chalk layers, and probably represents a later reworking of the figure's pose, but in all likelihood by the artist himself as it is confidently traced. The watermark on Solario's study is also closely similar to that in Giovanni Antonio Boltraffio's Portrait of a Woman (Biblioteca Pinacoteca Ambrosiana Cod. F. 290 inf. 7, Milan), an independent work though the design of this drawing reflects that of the altarpiece of St. Barbara (Gemäldegalerie Staatliche Museen, Berlin) commissioned in 1502 for S. Maria presso S. Satiro; the two drawings by Solario and Boltraffio are also executed in an extremely similar medium of colored chalks, but the sheet by Solario is greatly restored. When Solario's Bearded Man was exhibited together with the two famous portrait drawings in colored chalks by Boltraffio from the Ambrosiana (see also the Portrait of the Youth, Ambrosiana Cod. F. 290 inf. 8) in the Leonardo exhibition at The Metropolitan Museum of Art in 2003, the comparisons emphasized the great similarities of style and drawing technique shared by these three works (see Carmen C. Bambach in Metropolitan Museum of Art 2003, pp. 655-59, nos. 127-28). This raises the possibility that the dating of all three drawings may, in the end, not be dissimilar. Bearing in mind that Boltraffio died in 1516 and Solario in 1524, a date of 1515-24 for Solario's drawing, may be plausible, but this dating may be refined if the commission document for Solario's Pavia altarpiece is discovered.


The innovative use of colored chalks may suggest that the Metropolitan drawing, although utilized as a prototype for the apostle at left in the Pavia altarpiece, may have then also been a reworked for an independent function: the fact that the reworking of the hand on the lower left is in brush with iron gall ink, rather than in chalk, would strongly argue for the reuse of the design of the figure in a different context. An analogous case is probably represented by the pastel portrait by Boltraffio in the Ambrosiana (see above), which is based on the figure in the Saint Barbara altarpiece of 1502, now in Berlin. The use of the colored chalk technique here is intimately connected to Leonardo's practice and that of his closest pupils, and it would be numerous decades later that other artists would begin using this medium widely. (See McGrath, 1994; Thomas McGrath, "Colour in Italian Renaissance Drawings: Reconciling Theory and Practice in Central Italy and Venice," Apollo, vol. 146, no. 429 (November 1997), pp. 22-30; Thomas Mc Grath, "Federico Barocci and the History of Pastelli in Central Italy," Apollo, vol. 148, no. 441 (November 1998), pp. 3-9.)
(Carmen C. Bambach; March 24, 2006)
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。