微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)束腰外衣
品名(英)Tunic
入馆年号2021年,2021.146
策展部门迈克尔·洛克菲勒之翼The Michael C. Rockefeller Wing
创作者
创作年份公元 600 - 公元 1100
创作地区
分类机织纺织品(Textiles-Woven)
尺寸长 39 3/8 x 宽 39 3/8 英寸 (100 x 100 厘米) approximately
介绍(中)这款出色的瓦里束腰外衣由两块编织拼接而成,中间部分除外,为头部留出一个开口,形成一件无袖、及膝的V形颈部开口服装。它的正面和背面都装饰着叠瓦状图案的柱子,这些图案与平淡的金色相间。这种纺织品上的设计元素是如此抽象,以至于大多数当代观众都难以辨认,这使得它在视觉上让人想起抽象表现主义,同时在形式和结构上保持着深刻的安第斯风格

瓦里挂毯束腰外衣设计复杂,色彩鲜艳,是安第斯山脉最引人注目的纺织品之一。他们对扭曲、抽象和解构的非传统使用,挑战了长期以来学术界对美洲土著艺术的看法,即美洲土著艺术缺乏创造力,受制于压迫性的文化规范。这件束腰外衣巧妙地展示了瓦里艺术家的技艺和创造力

从公元600年到1000年左右,瓦里人统治着一个帝国,这个帝国扩张到了现在的秘鲁大部分地区。瓦里帝国诞生于华帕人(Huarpa)和南海岸纳斯卡人之间的互动,华帕人是当今阿亚库乔中部高地的一个当地群体,瓦里帝国跨越了多个地区、文化和艺术实践。瓦里行政人员依靠在从沙漠海岸到热带雨林的偏远地区建立的前哨基地,从而获得了大量宝贵的资源,如棉花、脊椎猴壳和热带鸟类羽毛。在许多方面,瓦里人为后来的印加帝国铺平了道路:他们打结的琴弦记录系统(khipu)和道路网络对几个世纪后印加领土的发展和管理至关重要

在四个多世纪的时间里,瓦里艺术家发展了一种艺术传统,达到了安第斯山脉中部历史上无与伦比的发明和多样性。除了色彩鲜艳的陶瓷和木制、石头或金属的小型肖像等便携式物品外,许多瓦里艺术品注定要佩戴。瓦里显贵们穿着五颜六色的编织服装、头饰、金属珠宝、马赛克耳环和面部彩绘。重要的是,将瓦里纺织品不仅仅视为二维的绘画作品,还应视为与其他形式的身体装饰相结合的服装。像本例这样的曲调会在身体上栩栩如生,其极其复杂的意象通过运动而变得生动起来,为佩戴者和观看者提供了壮观的视觉体验,对一些人来说,还有触觉体验

与后来的印加帝国一样,瓦里织锦束腰外衣在形状、尺寸、结构、布局和图案上都是标准化的。鉴于这种同质性,学者们认为瓦里挂毯束腰外衣的生产是由帝国行政人员监督的,这一解释得到了印加人在严格控制的环境中生产和分发类似标准化挂毯束腰上衣的事实的支持(Rowe 1978)。殖民地的资料表明,精细编织的印加束腰外衣,在克丘亚被称为uncu,被用作身份标志,作为财富储存,并在外交场合被赋予天赋。有证据表明,瓦里帝国也使用了类似的挂毯束腰外衣

事实上,考虑到生产所需的资源,很可能只有精英成员才会拥有这种质量的瓦里束腰外衣。经线(构成基底的线)通常由沿海地区种植的棉花制成,而纬线(构成图案的线)则由高地的骆驼毛制成。一旦这些纱线被收集并清洗干净,瓦里织布工就制备了天然染料来给它们上色。他们喜欢胭脂虫,一种在仙人掌上发现的昆虫,因为它有明亮的红色,比如这件外衣上的品红色。染色后,纱线被纺好,放在织机上。瓦里束腰外衣的制作是一项劳动密集型企业,通常需要合作,有时两名编织者在同一件衣服上工作。编织是一次一小段地完成的:如果仔细观察这件束腰外衣上的黄色条纹,可以看到"懒惰的线条",这是这些工作部分的界限(Bird和Skinner 1974:7;Bergh 1999:25)

尽管瓦里和印加挂毯束腰外衣有相似之处,但它们上面编织的图案却大不相同。在印加帝国,uncu通常用简单的几何形式装饰,而在瓦里帝国,它们有形象和详细的设计。因此,如果这件束腰外衣上编织的复杂图案一开始看起来很抽象,那么仔细一看就会发现,它由八个有翼猫科动物形式的神话人物组成。他们被描绘成侧影,手里拿着一根棍子,背上有图案织物。这种复合猫科动物的外衣上交替有两种不同的杖和织物。每种类型都有两种颜色:一种是奶油色和品红色,另一种是黄色和棕色。因此,这件束腰外衣上的图像非常有趣,因为它在同一个基本模型上混合了不同色调的图像细节,因此图案既重复又独特

瓦里束腰外衣的整体设计遵循对称性和对偶性原则,图案以二的倍数重复(Bergh 2012)。在这个例子中,该设计总共被复制了16次,这也是瓦里仪式D形结构中壁龛的数量(Bragayrac 1991;Williams和McEwan 2012:74)。可移动的物体和祖先的尸体可能已经在这些壁龛中展出,因此数字16也可能是指主持瓦里仪式空间的人物数量。虽然这种相似性可能只是一个简单的巧合,但瓦里束腰外衣设计中偶数的普遍存在表明它们有着更深的意义

其他媒体中的瓦里对象,例如
介绍(英)This outstanding Wari tunic consists of two woven panels stitched together—except at the center, to leave an opening for the head—to form a sleeveless, knee-length garment with a V-shaped neck opening. Both its front and back are decorated with columns of imbricated motifs that alternate with bands of plain, gold-like color. The design elements on this textile are so abstracted that they are illegible to most present-day viewers, making it a work that is visually reminiscent of Abstract Expressionism while remaining deeply Andean it its form and structure.

With their intricate designs and vivid colors, Wari tapestry tunics are some of the most striking textile creations of the Andes. Their unconventional use of distortion, abstraction, and deconstruction challenges the longstanding scholarly view of the arts of the indigenous Americas as uninventive, and subject to oppressing cultural norms. This tunic masterfully illustrates the level of skill and creativity reached by Wari artists.

From around 600 to 1000 A.D., the Wari ran an empire that expanded throughout most of what is now Peru. Born out of interactions between the Huarpa, a local group of the central highlands in present-day Ayacucho, and the Nasca people on the South Coast, the Wari Empire bridged multiple regions, cultures, and artistic practices. Wari administrators relied on outposts established in far-flung regions, from the desert coast to the tropical rainforest, thus gaining access to a multitude of valuable resources such as cotton, spondylus shell, and tropical bird feathers. In many ways, the Wari paved the way to the later Inca Empire: their knotted string recording system (khipu) and their road network were critical to the development and management of the Inca territory centuries after.

Over four centuries, Wari artists developed an artistic tradition that reached a degree of invention and diversity unmatched in the history of the Central Andes. In addition to portable objects such as brightly painted ceramics and small effigies in wood, stone, or metal, many Wari artworks were destined to be worn. Wari dignitaries are shown wearing colorful woven garments, headdresses, metal jewelry, mosaic earspools, and facial painting. It is essential to think of Wari textiles not simply as two-dimensional pictorial works, but also as garments meant to be worn in conjunction with other forms of body ornamentation. Tunics such as the present example would have come to life on the body, its fantastically complex imagery animated through movement, providing a spectacular visual and, for some, tactile experience for the wearer and the beholders.

As in the later Inca Empire, Wari tapestry tunics were standardized in their shape, dimensions, construction, layout, and motifs. Given this homogeneity, scholars believe that the production of Wari tapestry tunics was supervised by imperial administrators, an interpretation that is supported by the fact that the Incas produced and distributed their similarly standardized tapestry tunics in tightly controlled settings (Rowe 1978). Colonial sources indicate that finely woven Inca tunics, known as uncu in Quechua, were used as status markers, stored as wealth, and gifted in diplomatic contexts. Evidence points to a similar uses of tapestry tunics in the Wari Empire.

Indeed, it is likely that only members of the elite would have owned Wari tunics of this quality, considering the resources necessary to their production. The warp (the threads that form the base) was generally made of cotton, grown in coastal regions, while the weft (the threads that form the design) was made of camelid wool from the highlands. Once these yarns were gathered and cleaned, Wari weavers prepared natural dyes to color them. They favored cochineal, an insect found on cacti, for its bright red colors such as the magenta seen on this tunic. After dyeing, the yarn was spun and set on a loom. Making Wari tunics was such a labor-intensive enterprise that it usually required collaboration, with sometimes two weavers working on the same piece. Weaving was done in small sections at a time: if examining closely the yellow bands on this tunic, one can see “lazy lines,” which are the delimitations of these working segments (Bird and Skinner 1974: 7; Bergh 1999: 25).

Despite the similarities that exist between Wari and Inca tapestry tunics, the motifs woven on them differ greatly. In the Inca Empire, uncu were usually decorated with simple geometric forms, while in the Wari Empire, they bore figurative and detailed designs. Hence, if the complex motifs woven on this tunic might at first seem abstract, a closer look reveals that it consists of eight mythical figures in the form of winged felines. They are depicted in profile, holding a staff in their hand, with a patterned textile on their back. The composite felines are rendered with two variants of staff and textile that alternate on the tunic. Each type is woven in one of two colors: cream and magenta for one, and yellow and brown for the other. The imagery on this tunic is therefore extremely playful, as it mixes iconographic details with different hues on the same base model—the motifs being thus both repetitive and singular.

The overall design of Wari tunics is guided by principles of symmetry and duality, with motifs repeated in multiples of two (Bergh 2012). On this example, the design is reproduced sixteen times in total, which is also the number of niches in Wari ritual D-shaped structures (Bragayrac 1991; Williams and McEwan 2012: 74). Movable objects and ancestral bodies may have been put on display in those niches, hence the number sixteen may also reference the number of figures presiding over Wari ritual spaces. While this similarity might be a simple coincidence, the prevalence of even numbers in the design of Wari tunics points to them having a deeper meaning.

Wari objects in other media, such as painted ceramic vessels and carved wooden containers, were also decorated with winged felines. They commonly appear on Wari artworks and form part of a larger iconographic repertoire shared with Tiwanaku and earlier Andean cultures (Isbell et al. 2018), together with bird-headed and human-headed figures also holding staffs in their hands. Elements from the three species—human, avian, and feline—appear on each of these entities: for example, this feline has bird wings but also human arms and hands. The role and significance of these composite beings in Wari beliefs remains unknown, but they seem to have been connected in some way, as if all were variants of the same original being able to transform and take on these different identities.

At least two other known Wari tunics bear a winged feline motif identical to this one (King 1965: cat. 20; Bergh 2009: fig. 7), but the present example differs from the others in that it is the only one to have motifs that are distorted and compressed, sometimes reaching complete abstraction. The head of the feline is tilted upward, its only visible arm elongated, its feet placed perpendicular to each other, and its staff bent at a ninety-degree angle. As the separation between each figure is unclear, the viewer can only distinguish imbricated, presumably meaningless shapes from afar. Compared to Wari tapestry garments that have a clear grid layout on which motifs and colors repeat in a repetitive sequence, here the decoration of the tunic fails to create a pattern that would give points of reference to the viewer, or a rhythm to rely on. This results in a much more visually complex and deconstructed design, pushing the abstraction of the winged felines even further.

The reason behind this distortion of motifs on Wari textiles has long puzzled scholars (Sawyer 1963). It cannot be due to technical limitations, given the skill of Wari weavers. Rather, this formal expansion and compression was intentional, especially as it was limited to certain motifs: for instance, no distortion occurs on Wari tunics decorated with skulls. Was this mode of representation meant to reinforce a visual effect of the tunic when worn and in movement? Was it intended to be observed after consuming psychotropic substances that might have impacted the perception of certain motifs? Whatever the reason may be, it is undeniable that Wari tapestry tunics were esoteric objects in the Andes, their complex iconography perhaps only fully understood by a select few (Stone-Miller 1987). Yet in its masterful interplay of formal imagination with intricate weaving, its overall message of imperial power would be lost on no one.

Louise Deglin, Sylvan C. Coleman and Pam Coleman Memorial Fund Fellow, Arts of the Ancient Americas, 2022

References and Further Reading

Bergh, Susan E. 1999. “Pattern and Paradigm in Middle Horizon Tapestry Tunics.” Ph.D. Dissertation, New York, NY: Columbia University.

Bergh, Susan E. “The Bird and the Camelid (or Deer): A Ranked Pair of Wari Tapestry Tunics.” In Tiwanaku: Papers from the 2005 Mayer Center Symposium at the Denver Art Museum, edited by Young-Sánchez, 225–46. Denver: Denver Art Museum, 2009.

Bergh, Susan E. 2012. “Tapestry-Woven Tunics.” In Wari: Lords of the Ancient Andes, edited by Susan E. Bergh, 159–91. New York, NY and Cleveland, OH: Cleveland Museum of Art and Thames & Hudson.

Bird, Junius, and Milica Dimitrijevic Skinner. 1974. “The Technical Features of a Middle Horizon Tapestry Shirt from Peru.” Textile Museum Journal 4 (1): 5–13.

Bragayrac D., Enrique. “Archaeological Excavations in the Vegachayoq Moqo Sector of Huari.” In Huari Administrative Structure: Prehistoric Monumental Architecture and State Government, edited by William H. Isbell and Gordon F. McEwan, 71–80. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collections, 1991.

Conklin, William J. 1986. “The Mythic Geometry of the Ancient South Sierra.” In The Junius B. Bird Conference on Andean Textiles, April 7th and 8th, 1984, edited by Ann P. Rowe, 123–37. Washington, D.C: Textile Museum.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。