微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)木马
品名(英)Trotting horse
入馆年号1982年,1982.60.102
策展部门欧洲雕塑和装饰艺术European Sculpture and Decorative Arts
创作者Giambologna【1529 至 1608】【荷兰人】
创作年份公元 1700 - 公元 1899
创作地区
分类雕塑青铜(Sculpture-Bronze)
尺寸整体 (confirmed): 9 1/2 × 10 1/2 × 3 1/4 英寸 (24.1 × 26.7 × 8.3 厘米)
介绍(中)小跑马(A)于1982年作为杰克和贝尔·林斯基遗赠的一部分抵达大都会博物馆,并于1984年作为詹博洛尼亚的模型出版。林斯基夫妇在多年的收藏中对这位雕塑家的作品表现出特别的兴趣,包括赫拉克勒斯与埃里曼斯野猪和被钉十字架的基督(猫128,133),两者都被认为来自詹博洛尼亚模型。

事实上,林斯基马可以与一系列传统上与詹博洛尼亚及其作坊相关的青铜器归为一类。在1978年举行的詹博洛尼亚展览出版的目录中首次系统地讨论了这一语料库。该目录包括两匹步调种马,"成分与科西莫一世马术纪念碑的马相似"(1587年至1593年间为佛罗伦萨领主广场制作),但与另一组马的确认"类型"不同同样归因于詹博洛尼亚。[1] 在后一组中,最好的例子是1588年在圣马可赌场收藏的美第奇家族财产中记录的巴杰罗亲笔签名青铜器(第00页,图118a)。[2] 这两种类型的组成在鬃毛的形状和长度、耳朵的位置以及马钉的存在与否方面有所不同。

1987年,查尔斯·艾弗里(Charles Avery)指出,从未发现林斯基马所采用的模型的Giambologna亲笔签名,认为类似铸件的大量生产应归功于安东尼奥·苏西尼(Antonio Susini),因此他将成为负责流行原型广泛传播的人。该作品的名气在引人注目的视觉证据中得到了证明,例如威廉·范·海希特(Willem van Haecht)的油画描绘了科内利斯·范德吉斯特(Cornelis van der Geest)画廊(安特卫普鲁本斯舒伊斯),其中一匹踱步的马在中央前景的桌子上的一组青铜器中突出显示。[3]帕特里夏·温格拉夫最近更新的复制品清单包括林斯基马。[4]

然而,理查德·斯通(Richard Stone)对我们的马的技术分析挑战了文艺复兴时期起源的假设。[5]该预言的许多方面指向更晚的日期。该合金是一种不寻常的黄铜汞合金,锌含量高。核心是石膏。尾部单独铸造并通过插入两个螺纹孔的内部螺纹凸耳连接。两个孔的末端都是整齐的圆锥体,两个圆锥体具有相同的顶角,这表明使用了现代麻花钻。不精确的表面处理 - 特别是尾巴,鬃毛和头部 - 以及几乎完全没有冷加工也支持了后来的年代。

同样,小马(B)于1924年作为文艺复兴时期的青铜器进入博物馆,但铸造特性表明并非如此。6]受影响小跑马的相同类型学的启发,小雕像由低合金含铅黄铜制成,核心是石膏,这些特征使其与佛罗伦萨的生产区分开来。两个螺旋塞,一个在马的胸前,另一个在腹部,有一个宽而短的形状,非常细的线,而且——十七世纪最不寻常的——尖端被整齐地变成了一个浅锥体。因此,我们很可能会发现自己又一次迟到了詹博洛尼亚(Giambologna)的著名模特。
-TM

脚注
(有关缩短参考文献的关键,请参阅大都会艺术博物馆的艾伦、意大利文艺复兴和巴洛克青铜器的参考书目。纽约:大都会艺术博物馆,2022。


1. C. Avery and Radcliffe 1978, cats. 151 (V&A, A.148-1910), TK (Royal Collection, RCIN 35467).
2. 迪米特里奥斯·齐科斯在保洛齐·斯特罗齐和齐科斯 2006 年,第 275 页,猫。60. 3. C.艾弗里,
1987年,第268页,第132号; 另见C.艾弗里,2000年,第12页。
4. 温格拉夫 2014,第 134–35 页。
5. R. Stone/TR,2011 年 3 月 29 日。
6. 同上。
介绍(英)The Trotting Horse (A) arrived at the Met in 1982 as part of the Jack and Belle Linsky bequest and was published in 1984 as after a model by Giambologna. The Linskys had demonstrated a particular interest in the work of this sculptor over their years of collecting, including the Hercules with the Erymanthian Boar and The Crucified Christ (cats. 128, 133), both also presumed to derive from Giambologna models.

Indeed, the Linsky horse can be grouped with a series of bronzes traditionally associated with Giambologna and his workshop. This corpus was systematically discussed for the first time in the catalogue published for the Giambologna exhibition held in 1978. The catalogue included two pacing stallions “similar in composition to the horse of the equestrian monument of Cosimo I” (made for Piazza della Signoria, Florence, between 1587 and 1593), but different from the confirmed “type” of another group of horses likewise attributed to Giambologna.[1] Of this latter group, the best example is the autograph bronze in the Bargello recorded in 1588 among the Medici possessions held at the Casino di San Marco (p. 00, fig. 118a).[2] The two types of composition vary in the shape and length of the mane, the position of the ears, and the presence or absence of horse tack.

In 1987, Charles Avery, noting that a Giambologna autograph of the model adopted in the Linsky horse had never been found, argued that the large production of similar casts should be attributed to Antonio Susini, who would therefore be the one responsible for the widespread diffusion of the popular prototype. The composition’s fame is attested in striking visual evidence such as the oil painting by Willem van Haecht depicting the gallery of Cornelis van der Geest (Rubenshuis, Antwerp), in which a pacing horse is prominently displayed among a group of bronzes on a table in the center foreground.[3] The list of replicas recently updated by Patricia Wengraf includes the Linsky horse.[4]

However, Richard Stone’s technical analysis of our horse challenges the presumption of a Renaissance provenance.[5] A number of aspects of the facture point to a much later date. The alloy is an unusual amalgam of brass with a high percentage of zinc. The core is plaster. The tail was cast separately and attached by means of an internal threaded lug, inserted into two threaded holes. Both holes end in neat cones, and both cones have identical apical angles, which suggests the use of a modern twist drill. The imprecise surface treatment—particularly of the tail, mane, and head—and the almost complete absence of cold work support a later dating as well.

Similarly, the small Horse (B) entered the museum in 1924 as a Renaissance bronze, but casting peculiarities say otherwise.[6] Inspired by the same typology that influenced the Trotting Horse, the statuette is made of a low-alloy leaded brass and the core is plaster, features that set it apart from Florentine production. Two screw plugs, one on the horse’s chest and the other on its abdomen, have a broad, short shape, very fine threads and—most unusual for the seventeenth century—tips that have been neatly turned to a shallow cone. It is therefore likely that we find ourselves with another late casting of a celebrated model by Giambologna.
-TM

Footnotes
(For key to shortened references see bibliography in Allen, Italian Renaissance and Baroque Bronzes in The Metropolitan Museum of Art. NY: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2022.)


1. C. Avery and Radcliffe 1978, cats. 151 (V&A, A.148-1910), TK (Royal Collection, RCIN 35467).
2. Dimitrios Zikos in Paolozzi Strozzi and Zikos 2006, p. 275, cat. 60.
3. C. Avery 1987, p. 268, no. 132; see also C. Avery 2000, p. 12.
4. Wengraf 2014, pp. 134–35.
5. R. Stone/TR, March 29, 2011.
6. Ibid.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。