微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)瓶子,猫脸
品名(英)Bottle, Feline face
入馆年号1963年,63.232.9
策展部门迈克尔·洛克菲勒之翼The Michael C. Rockefeller Wing
创作者
创作年份公元前 700 - 公元前 300
创作地区秘鲁(Peru)
分类陶瓷容器(Ceramics-Containers)
尺寸高 8 1/8 × 直径 5 3/8 英寸 (20.6 × 13.7 厘米)
介绍(中)一个长方形的,程式化的猫脸和夸张的尖牙装饰着这个短脖子的球形瓶子的一侧。猫科动物的前腿突出在脸下方。瓶子的另一面是没有装饰的。瓶子的表面似乎已经抛光过。有证据表明瓶子中间周围有一个凹痕,可能表明顶部和底部分别手工成型,连接的位置。在瓶子表面上倾斜边缘的四个大致椭圆形像差的切割猫科动物装饰的两侧可以看到两个手柄的证据,现在不见了。缺失的手柄可能代表了猫科动物脸的耳朵。

猫科动物的面部图案在查文和帕拉卡斯艺术中都很常见(例如,参见MMA1979.206.1148)。这些面孔被夸张的牙齿风格化,在两种文化中似乎都具有神话意义。这个瓶子上明显的猫科动物装饰是在伊卡谷形成时期帕拉卡斯遗址中发现的广泛设计的特征。这艘船上的脸受到查文艺术传统的强烈影响,但牙齿被进一步风格化成不会打破唇线而不是弯曲成点的带子。这种与查文艺术经典的轻微偏差,加上设计的简单性,表明日期介于早期(公元前700-500年)和中期(公元前500-300年)之间。帕拉卡斯陶瓷相。

帕拉卡斯陶瓷传统,如查文陶器,喜欢切割装饰。然后,这些切割设计被涂上由氧化铁制成的各种颜色,用于红色,黄色和棕色,以及其他几种矿物,包括用于绿色和蓝色的铜矿物,以及用于白色和黑色的硅酸盐粘土。这种涂料与树脂混合,以帮助它与陶瓷表面结合并获得光泽。陶艺家不使用陶轮或模具,而是手工制作粘土。这艘船很可能是使用桨和砧技术建造的,尽管盘绕也很常见。桨叶和砧座技术使用现有容器或其他模具来构建新容器的底座,然后将粘土添加到该底座以构建侧面。使用木桨来操纵粘土,同时使用光滑的石头将粘土固定到位。

帕拉卡斯文化以秘鲁海岸的半岛命名,那里发现了大型太平间遗址,存在于公元前 700 年至公元 1 年的秘鲁南海岸。帕拉卡斯的考古证据来自两大墓葬群,即帕拉卡斯洞穴和帕拉卡斯墓地。关于这些人是谁,或者他们在哪里以及如何生活,人们知之甚少。该容器很可能是葬礼的一部分,尽管它可能在被埋葬之前曾在家庭中使用过。瓶子在埋葬时可能是新的,或者手柄的损坏可能表明以前日常使用过。

从帕拉卡斯墓葬中发现了各种各样的物品,包括大量的纺织品和陶瓷。秘鲁海岸干燥的气候有助于保存墓葬中的精致和有机材料。帕拉卡斯风格(公元前700年-公元1年)与查文文化(公元前1200-500年)大致同时发展,其文化中心位于现代首都利马以北的秘鲁安卡什地区。查文的艺术风格对帕拉卡斯艺术非常有影响。查文艺术以高度详细的风格化切割设计而闻名,包括石材、金属(例如,参见 MMA 2003.274a,b)和陶瓷。查文风格随着它从查文德万塔尔的中心传播而演变,可能是通过奢侈品贸易。结果,在秘鲁南部的钦卡和阿卡里山谷之间,形成了一种独特的帕拉卡斯风格,考古学家用它来区分帕拉卡斯与当代周边文化以及纳斯卡人,纳斯卡人似乎占据了帕拉卡斯之后的地区(公元100-700年)。

人们认为纺织品有助于在整个安第斯山脉中部传播查文风格。纺织品是安第斯山脉的基础工艺,远远早于任何陶瓷传统。帕拉卡斯文化中这种丰富的纺织传统的例子,以及它从查文风格的演变而来的例子,从彩绘棉花碎片(MMA 1987.394.704)等物体开始,到丰富的帕拉卡斯地幔,如刺绣碎片(例如MMA)33.149.25)。 帕拉卡斯木乃伊捆由许多大量刺绣的地幔组成,再加上保存它们的帕拉卡斯半岛干燥的气候,产生了大量保存下来的刺绣碎片。萨沙·尼克松,硕士候选人,巴德研究生中心,2017 其他帕拉卡斯猫面目 64.228.90 64.228.112


64.228.144

1976.287.24





62.266.72 文中

未提及的其他秘鲁文化中具有猫面孔的物体 1978.412.203

1978.412.210

来源和附加阅读

汉堡,理查德· 查文和安第斯文明的起源 。伦敦:泰晤士河和哈德逊河,1995年。

德莱昂纳迪斯丽莎。"编码过程,在帕拉卡斯烧制后彩绘陶瓷中体现意义。"在创造价值,创造意义:前哥伦布世界中的技术,由Cathy Costin编辑。华盛顿特区:敦巴顿橡树研究图书馆和馆藏(2016 年),第 129-166 页。

Druc,Isabelle C."秘鲁Chavãnde Huantar的陶瓷多样性"。 《拉丁美洲古代》第15卷,第3期(2004年),第344-63页。

Eerkens Jelmer W等人,"秘鲁纳斯卡陶器上红色和黑色颜料的铁同位素分析"。 考古与人类学科学6(2014),第241-254页。

Proulx Donald A. "Paracas and Nasca: Regional Cultures on the South Coast of Peru."在《南美考古学手册 》中,Helaine Silverman和William Isbell编辑,第563-584页。施普林格出版社,2008年。

索耶·艾伦。 古代秘鲁陶瓷:内森·卡明斯收藏。纽约:大都会艺术博物馆,1966年。

西尔弗曼·海莱恩。"帕拉卡斯问题:考古学视角"。在帕拉卡斯艺术与建筑:秘鲁南海岸的对象和背景中,由安妮保罗编辑,第348-415页。爱荷华市: 爱荷华大学出版社, 1991.

斯通丽贝卡。安第斯山脉的艺术:从查文到印加。纽约:泰晤士河和哈德逊艺术世界系列,2012年。
介绍(英)A rectangular, stylized feline face with exaggerated fangs decorates one side of this globular bottle with a short neck. The front legs of the feline protrude below the face. The other side of the bottle is undecorated. The surface of the bottle appears to have been burnished. There is evidence of an indentation around the middle of the bottle, possibly an indication of where the top and bottom, shaped by hand separately, were joined. Evidence of two handles, now missing, can be seen on either side of the incised feline decoration in the four roughly oval aberrations on the upper sloping edge of the bottle’s surface. The missing handles may have represented ears for the feline face.

Feline face motifs are common in both Chavín and Paracas art (see, for example, MMA 1979.206.1148). The faces are stylized with exaggerated teeth and appear to have a mythological meaning in both cultures. The feline decoration evident on this bottle is characteristic of widespread designs found at Ica Valley formative period Paracas sites. The face on this vessel is strongly influenced by Chavín artistic tradition, but the teeth have been further stylized into bands that do not break the lip line rather than curving into points. This slight deviation from the Chavín artistic canon, combined with the simplicity of the design, indicates a date from between the Early (700–500 B.C.) and Middle (500–300 B.C.) Paracas ceramic phases.

The Paracas ceramic tradition, like Chavín pottery, favored incised decorations. These incised designs were then painted with a variety of colors made from iron oxides for red, yellow, and brown, and several other minerals including copper minerals for green and blue, and silicate clays for white and black. This paint was mixed with a resin to help it bind to the ceramic surface and achieve a shine. Ceramicists did not use potters’ wheels or molds, instead they built up the clay by hand. This vessel was likely constructed using the paddle and anvil technique, though coiling was also common. The paddle and anvil technique uses an existing vessel or other mold to build up the base of the new vessel, then clay is added to that base to build up the sides. A wooden paddle was used to manipulate the clay and a smooth stone was used at the same time to keep the clay in place.

The Paracas culture, named for the peninsula on the coast of Peru where large mortuary sites have been found, existed on the south coast of Peru from 700 B.C.–A.D. 1. The archeological evidence for Paracas comes from two major groups of burials, known as Paracas Cavernas and Paracas Necropolis. Little is known about who these people were, or where and how they lived. It is likely that the vessel was part of a funerary offering, though it may have been used in household prior to being interred. The bottle may have been new when placed in a burial or the damage to the handles may indicate prior everyday use.

A wide range of objects have been recovered from Paracas burials, including a wealth of textiles and ceramics. The dry climate of the Peruvian coast aided preservation of delicate and organic materials in the burials. The Paracas style (700 B.C.– A.D. 1) developed roughly contemporarily with the Chavín culture (1200–500 B.C.) whose cultural center is in the Ancash region of Peru north of the modern capital of Lima. The Chavín artistic style was very influential in Paracas art. Chavín art is known for, among other things, highly detailed stylized incised designs across all mediums including stone, metal (see, for example, MMA 2003.274a, b), and ceramics. Chavín style evolved as it was disseminated out from the center at Chavín de Huantar, likely through trade of luxury materials. The result, between the Chinca and Acari valleys in southern Peru, was a distinct Paracas style, which archeologists use to differentiate Paracas from contemporary surrounding cultures and from the Nazca, who appear to occupy the area subsequent to the Paracas (A.D. 100–700).

It is thought that textiles helped to disseminate the Chavín style throughout the central Andes. Textiles are the foundational craft in the Andes and appeared well before any ceramic tradition. Examples of this rich textile tradition within the Paracas culture, and its evolution from a Chavín style, begin with objects like a painted cotton fragment (MMA 1987.394.704), and culminate in a wealth of Paracas mantles like embroidered fragments (e.g. MMA 33.149.25). Paracas mummy bundles, consisting of many heavily embroidered mantles, combined with the dry climate of the Paracas peninsula which preserved them, has resulted in a wealth of preserved embroidery fragments.


Sasha Nixon, MA Candidate, Bard Graduate Center, 2017

Other Paracas Feline Face Objects

64.228.90
64.228.112
64.228.144
1976.287.24
62.266.72

Objects from other Peruvian cultures not mentioned in the text that have feline faces
1978.412.203
1978.412.210

Sources and Additional Reading

Burger, Richard L. Chavin and the origins of Andean Civilization . London: Thames and Hudson, 1995.

DeLeonardis Lisa. "Encoded Process, Embodied Meaning in Paracas Post-Fired Painted Ceramics." In Making Value, Making Meaning: Techné in the Pre-Columbian World, edited by Cathy Costin. Washington D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collections (2016), pp. 129-166.

Druc, Isabelle C. "Ceramic Diversity in Chavín De Huantar, Peru." Latin American Antiquity 15, no. 3 (2004), pp. 344-63.

Eerkens Jelmer W, et al. "Iron Isotope Analysis of Red and Black Pigments on Pottery in Nasca, Peru." Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 6 (2014), pp. 241-254.

Proulx Donald A. "Paracas and Nasca: Regional Cultures on the South Coast of Peru." In Handbook of South American Archaeology , eds. Helaine Silverman and William Isbell, pp. 563-584. Springer Press, 2008.

Sawyer Alan. Ancient Peruvian Ceramics: The Nathan Cummings Collection. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1966.

Silverman Helaine. "The Paracas Problem: Archaeological Perspectives." In Paracas Art and Architecture: Object and Context in South Coastal Peru , edited by Anne Paul, pp. 348-415. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1991.

Stone Rebecca. Art of the Andes: From Chaví­n to Inca. New York: Thames & Hudson World of Art Series, 2012.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。