微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)鸟类钟
品名(英)Avian Bell
入馆年号1966年,66.196.6
策展部门迈克尔·洛克菲勒之翼The Michael C. Rockefeller Wing
创作者
创作年份公元 900 - 公元 1520
创作地区哥斯达黎加或巴拿马(Costa Rica or Panama)
分类金属装饰品(Metal-Ornaments)
尺寸高 1 1/2 英寸, 重 0.663 盎司 (3.8 厘米, 18.8 g)
介绍(中)这个带有梨形谐振器的钟被鸟形的顶端覆盖,可能是鹰或秃鹫,其位置表明它正在从飞行中着陆。鸟的翅膀伸展,脚接地。这只鸟的头顶上有一簇或冠,由圆形带顶部的半球形圆顶组成。它的每个半球形眼睛都镶嵌成一个圆形带,并附着在头部的每一侧。它的喙向下弯曲;上颚和下颚最初由两块独立的蜡形成,上颚钩在下一块上。像来自中美洲地峡的其他铃铛一样,这个例子是失蜡铸造的,这意味着它的所有金属最初都是用蜡设计的。铸造和缓慢冷却由顶端底部的树枝状外观证实。在制作鸟的模型时,冶金学家小心翼翼地将四条蜡带连接成每个翅膀,将六条蜡带连接成尾巴。仔细检查后,保留了带子的半圆柱形(现在是金属);翅膀和尾巴不是由一块连续的蜡形成的,后来被凿成以提供细节。冶金学家只有在连接后才能切割形成翅膀和尾巴的这些蜡线的末端;它们的末端有一个干净的断裂,表明可能用凿子划一划来缩短蜡。这些金属带暗示了鸟的标记,例如在鹰(Harpia harpyja)的尾巴和/或翅膀上看到的交替的黑白行。或者,它突出的喙类似于秃鹫王(Sarcoramphus papa)及其肉瘤的喙。分类学的规范可能是不可能的,或者实际上不适合制造这些物体的民族的认识论。

这只鸟坐在一个3.9毫米高的悬挂环上。该环由两根金属线组成,这些金属线在打蜡时连接在一起。与大都会收藏中的另一款铃铛1978.514.43不同,这里形成环的两条线没有经过抛光或平滑处理,使它们看起来好像是一体的。然而,与另一个钟类似,有两个带子缠绕在顶端的底部,以使其与谐振器区分开来。谐振器的表面非常粗糙,表明它在铸造后或挖掘后没有抛光;划痕和孔隙率很明显。穿过谐振器开口的谐振器的宽度为13.7毫米,垂直宽度为16.2毫米。靠近谐振器开口顶部,壁厚1.4毫米。有一个似乎是金属的拍板,它四处移动并撞击谐振器的壁。在这种情况下(参见大都会艺术博物馆1978.514.44),谐振器开口处有明显的变形,特别是在"6"(物体编号标签的一部分)的右侧和该区域开口的两侧。开口也相对不对称。有可能在铸造铃铛后将拍板添加到谐振器中;冶金学家将边缘相互锤击,插入拍板,然后再次向相反方向锤击它们以使它们更近,防止拍板逸出。另一种选择是用铃铛铸造拍板,艺术家在铸造后去除了核心材料,让拍板可以自由移动。

鸟类是地峡艺术中的常见图案,即来自中美洲地区的艺术,包括今天的巴拿马、哥斯达黎加和太平洋尼加拉瓜的一部分,它们经常被描绘成金属和玉石。竖琴鹰以其成年鹰的双尖冠而闻名,是一系列Veraguas-Chiriquí铸造吊坠的主题(例如,大都会艺术博物馆1991.419.8,哥斯达黎加中央银行766,敦巴顿橡树PC。B.307),但这种经常被代表的鸟也被认为是秃鹫王或蜂鸟(Cooke 1984)。借鉴塔拉曼卡人的民族志,Aguilar(1996)将这一系列鹰/秃鹫/蜂鸟吊坠和描绘拟人化鸟类的物体与萨满的飞行联系起来,萨满可能将死者带到地下世界。他提出,在一些这样的吊坠上出现的铃铛有助于在萨满飞行过程中与灵魂的交流。在布里布里的世界概念中,鸟类扮演着交际的角色,提醒萨满注意危险,并向造物主神西伯传递信息(Bozzoli 1975,150)。

然而,在西班牙殖民时期的记载和其他民族志中,很明显,金属的生产和使用不仅限于宗教背景。土著人民交易金属物品,包括所谓的"鹰吊坠"(见1979.206.540和1991.419.8)和未加工形式的金属,有时是为了可可。这些吊坠 - 其中有一系列设计 - 可能是不同种族的识别工具。这些吊坠在塔拉曼卡地区的流通记录在西班牙征服之后和20世纪(Ibarra 2003)。哥斯达黎加中部加勒比海和大奇里基的金属工人的社会组织尚不确定,但布里布里将一个氏族inokÖLdiwak确定为"金钱溪的所有者"或"黄金",以及其他氏族,如akterwak("各种鳄梨的所有者")和amukwak("龙舌兰属[原文如此]的所有者")(Bozzoli 1975, 16年伊瓦拉2003年的替代翻译,第389页)。

从尤卡坦州奇琴伊察的神圣天然井中发现了带有鸟类顶端的类似铃铛(例如,墨西哥城国家人类学博物馆的 10-4573 和 10-B1320),很可能是从中美洲地峡进口的(Cockrell 等人,2015 年;Pillsbury et al. 2017, cat.编号167.1,167.2)。其中一些钟的共振器可能在沉积前被故意压碎。雕刻的绿石吊坠上刻有鹰和其他鸟类,偶尔以拟人化的形式和不同程度的抽象形式展示,来自哥斯达黎加的大尼科亚和中加勒比地区。其中一个被发现带有木珠项链,作为拉雷格拉遗址的陪葬包(埋葬 4)的一部分;附近墓葬5的木制元素可追溯到公元前500(+/- 70)cal.(Beta-35853)(Guerrero等人,1991,27-29)。鸟类不仅被描绘在便携式物品中,而且还作为人们饮食的一部分食用。居住在圣玛丽亚河上的Sitio Sierra的人们吃掉了各种各样的鸟类动物群,距离巴拿马太平洋一侧的帕里塔湾内陆12.5公里(Cooke 1984)。人们吃的鸟类,包括鸭子、苍鹭、猫头鹰和啄木鸟,应该生活在沼泽或林地,而不是在热带雨林中。鸟类也是Sitio Sierra和Cerro Juan Díaz的葬礼组合的一部分,在那里发现了雀形目遗骸(Cooke和Jiménez 2010)。今天,韦拉瓜斯北部的Buglé人通过使用陷阱,弹弓或步枪捕获了各种鸟类,但他们在花园和休耕地发现了许多这些物种和其他游戏,同时偶尔冒险进入更多的森林地区追捕它们(Smith 2005)。

布莱恩·科克雷尔,策展研究员,非洲,大洋洲和美洲艺术2017年

参考文献
Aguilar Piedra,Carlos H. Los usékares de oro。圣何塞:中央银行博物馆基金会,1996年。

Bozzoli de Wille,María E."哥斯达黎加布里布里印第安人信仰体系中的出生和死亡"。博士论文,佐治亚大学,1975年。

科克雷尔、布莱恩、何塞·路易斯·鲁瓦尔卡巴·西尔和伊迪丝·奥尔蒂斯·迪亚斯。"钟声为谁而下:来自奇琴伊察萨格拉多天然井的金属。"考古学57.6(2015):977-995。

库克,理查德C."史前巴拿马中部的鸟和人"。在《地峡考古学的最新发展:中美洲下史的进展》,弗雷德里克·W·兰格编辑,243-281页。牛津: 律师协会, 1984.

库克、理查德和马克西莫·希门尼斯。"巴拿马中部古代稀树草原两个前哥伦布时期遗址的动物衍生文物:关于它们与社会等级和文化对动物态度研究的相关性的最新情况。"在Anthropological Ways to Zooarchaeology: Colonialism, Complexity and Animal Transformations中,由Douglas V. Campana,Pamela Crabtree,S.D. deFrance,Justin Lev-Tov和A.M. Choyke编辑,30-55。牛津: 牛轭图书, 2010.

格雷罗M.,胡安V.,里卡多巴斯克斯L.和费德里科索拉诺B."Entierros secundarios y restos orgánicos de e. 500 A.C. preservados en un área de inundación marina, Golfo de Nicoya, Costa Rica."文库洛斯17(1991):17-51。

伊瓦拉,尤金妮娅。"十六世纪中美洲南部土著人民日常生活中的黄金。"在古代哥斯达黎加,巴拿马和哥伦比亚的黄金和权力中,由Jeffrey Quilter和John W. Hoopes编辑,383-419。华盛顿特区:敦巴顿橡树研究图书馆和收藏,2003 年。

Pillsbury,Joanne,Timothy Potts和Kim N. Richter编辑黄金王国:古代美洲的奢侈品艺术。洛杉矶:J.保罗盖蒂博物馆,2017年。

史密斯,德里克A."花园游戏:巴拿马西部的转移耕作,土著狩猎和野生动物生态学。人类生态学33,第4期(2005):505-537。
介绍(英)This bell with a pear-shaped resonator is surmounted by a finial in the shape of a bird, possibly an eagle or vulture, in a position suggesting that it is landing from flight. The wings of the bird are outstretched and its feet are grounded. The bird has a tuft or crest on top of its head that consists of a semispherical dome on top of a circular band. Each of its semi-spherical eyes is set into a circular band and attached to each side of the head. Its beak curves downward; the upper and lower jaw were originally formed with two separate pieces of wax, and the upper piece hooks over the lower one. Like other bells from the Central American Isthmus, the present example was lost-wax-cast, meaning that all of its metal was originally designed in wax. Casting, and slow cooling, is confirmed by the dendritic appearance of the base of the finial. When making the model of the bird, the metallurgist carefully joined four bands of wax to form each wing and six bands of wax to form the tail. On close inspection, the semi-cylindrical form of the bands (now in metal) is preserved; the wings and tail were not formed from one continuous piece of wax that was later chiseled to provide detail. The metallurgist cut the ends of these wax threads forming the wings and tail only after joining; there is a clean break at their ends, indicating one stroke of a chisel was likely used to shorten the wax. These bands of metal suggest the markings of the bird, such as the alternating rows of black and white seen on the tail and/or wings of the harpy eagle (Harpia harpyja). Alternatively, its prominent beak resembles that of the king vulture (Sarcoramphus papa) and its caruncle. A taxonomic specification may be impossible, or indeed inappropriate to the epistemologies of the peoples who made these objects.

The bird sits on a suspension loop, which is 3.9 mm high. This loop is comprised of two threads of metal that were joined when they were wax. Unlike another bell in the Met’s collection, 1978.514.43, here the two threads that form the loop have not been polished or smoothed, making them appear as if they are one. However, similar to the other bell, there are two bands that wrap around the base of the finial to make it distinct from the resonator. The resonator’s surface is very rough, suggesting that it was not polished after casting or much after excavation; scratches and porosity are noticeable. The width of the resonator, crossing the resonator opening, is 13.7 mm, and the perpendicular width is 16.2 mm. Close to the top of the resonator opening, the wall is 1.4 mm thick. There is a clapper that appears to be metal that moves around and strikes the walls of the resonator. In this case (cf. Metropolitan Museum of Art 1978.514.44), there is notable deformation at the resonator opening, particularly to the right of the “6” (part of the object number label) and on either side of the opening in this area. The opening is also relatively asymmetric. It is possible that the clapper was added to the resonator after casting the bell; the metallurgist hammered the edges away from each other, inserted the clapper, and then hammered them again the opposite direction to draw them closer, preventing the clapper from escaping. An alternative is that the clapper was cast with the bell, and the artist removed the core material after casting allowing the clapper to move freely.

Birds are a common motif in Isthmian art, that is, art from the region of Central America that includes present-day Panama, Costa Rica, and part of Pacific Nicaragua, and they were often depicted in metal and jade. The harpy eagle, known for its double-pointed crest on adults, is the subject of a range of Veraguas-Chiriquí cast pendants (e.g., Metropolitan Museum of Art 1991.419.8, Banco Central de Costa Rica 766, Dumbarton Oaks PC.B.307), but this frequently represented bird also has been suggested to be a king vulture or a hummingbird (Cooke 1984). Drawing on ethnography of Talamancan peoples, Aguilar (1996) associates this range of eagle/vulture/hummingbird pendants and objects that depict anthropomorphized birds with the flight of shamans, who may carry a deceased person to the underworld. He proposes that bells that appear on some such pendants facilitate communication with spirits during this process of shamanic flight. In the Bribri conception of the world, birds play communicative roles, alerting shamans of dangers and carrying messages to Sibö, the creator deity (Bozzoli 1975, 150).

In Spanish colonial accounts and other ethnographies, however, it is evident metal production and use were not limited to religious contexts. Indigenous peoples traded metal objects, including the so-called “eagle pendants” (see 1979.206.540 and 1991.419.8) and metal in unworked form, occasionally for cacao. These pendants—of which there is a range of designs—may have been an identifying tool of different ethnicities. The circulation of these pendants in the Talamanca region is documented after the Spanish conquest and into the 20th century (Ibarra 2003). The social organization of metalworkers in the Central Caribbean of Costa Rica and Greater Chiriquí is uncertain, but the Bribri identified a clan, inokÖLdiwak, as the “owners of the creek of money” or “of gold” among other clans such as akterwak (“owners of a variety of avocado”) and amukwak (“owners of Agave sp. [sic]”) (Bozzoli 1975, 36; alternate translation in Ibarra 2003, 389).

Similar bells with avian finials (e.g., 10-4573 and 10-B1320 in the Museo Nacional de Antropología in Mexico City) were recovered from the Sacred Cenote at Chichén Itzá in Yucatán and were likely imported from the Central American Isthmus (Cockrell et al. 2015; Pillsbury et al. 2017, cat. nos. 167.1, 167.2). The resonators of some of these bells may have been intentionally crushed before deposition. Harpy eagles and other birds are featured on carved greenstone pendants, occasionally shown in anthropomorphized form and with varying degrees of abstraction, from the Greater Nicoya and Central Caribbean regions of Costa Rica. One was found with a necklace of wooden beads, as part of a funerary bundle (Burial 4) from the site of La Regla; a wooden element from the nearby Burial 5 was dated to 500 (+/- 70) cal. BC (Beta-35853) (Guerrero et al. 1991, 27-29). Birds were not only depicted in portable objects, but also consumed as part of people’s diets. Varied avian fauna were eaten by people living at Sitio Sierra, on the Santa María River, 12.5 km inland from the Parita Bay on the Pacific side of Panama (Cooke 1984). The birds that people ate, including ducks, herons, owls, and woodpeckers, would have been living in marshy or woodland areas, not in the rainforest. Birds also were part of funerary assemblages at Sitio Sierra and at Cerro Juan Díaz, where remains of passerines were recovered (Cooke and Jiménez 2010). Today, Buglé peoples in northern Veraguas capture diverse bird species, by using traps, slingshots, or rifles, but they find many of these species and other game in gardens and fallows, while occasionally venturing into more forested areas to pursue them (Smith 2005).

Bryan Cockrell, Curatorial Fellow, Arts of Africa, Oceania, and the Americas 2017

References
Aguilar Piedra, Carlos H. Los usékares de oro. San José: Fundación Museos Banco Central, 1996.

Bozzoli de Wille, María E. “Birth and Death in the Belief System of the Bribri Indians of Costa Rica.” PhD diss., University of Georgia, 1975.

Cockrell, Bryan, José Luís Ruvalcaba Sil, and Edith Ortiz Díaz. “For Whom the Bells Fall: Metals from the Cenote Sagrado, Chichén Itzá.” Archaeometry 57.6 (2015): 977-995.

Cooke, Richard C. “Bird and Men in Prehistoric Central Panama.” In Recent Developments in Isthmian Archaeology: Advances in the Prehistory of Lower Central America, edited by Frederick W. Lange, 243-281. Oxford: BAR, 1984.

Cooke, Richard and Máximo Jiménez. “Animal-Derived Artifacts at Two Pre-Columbian Sites in the Ancient Savannas of Central Panama: An Update on their Relevance to Studies of Social Hierarchy and Cultural Attitudes towards Animals.” In Anthropological Approaches to Zooarchaeology: Colonialism, Complexity and Animal Transformations, edited by Douglas V. Campana, Pamela Crabtree, S.D. deFrance, Justin Lev-Tov, and A.M. Choyke, 30-55. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2010.

Guerrero M., Juan V., Ricardo Vázquez L., and Federico Solano B. “Entierros secundarios y restos orgánicos de ca. 500 A.C. preservados en un área de inundación marina, Golfo de Nicoya, Costa Rica.” Vínculos 17 (1991): 17-51.

Ibarra, Eugenia. “Gold in the Everyday Lives of Indigenous Peoples of Sixteenth-Century Southern Central America.” In Gold and Power in Ancient Costa Rica, Panama, and Colombia, edited by Jeffrey Quilter and John W. Hoopes, 383-419. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 2003.

Pillsbury, Joanne, Timothy Potts, and Kim N. Richter, eds. Golden Kingdoms: Luxury Arts in the Ancient Americas. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum, 2017.

Smith, Derek A. “Garden Game: Shifting Cultivation, Indigenous Hunting and Wildlife Ecology in Western Panama.” Human Ecology 33, no. 4 (2005): 505-537.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。