微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)断流阀盘
品名(英)Cutout Disk
入馆年号1987年,1987.394.50
策展部门迈克尔·洛克菲勒之翼The Michael C. Rockefeller Wing
创作者
创作年份公元 500 - 公元 700
创作地区秘鲁(Peru)
分类金属装饰品(Metal-Ornaments)
尺寸直径 10 5/8 英寸 (27 厘米)
介绍(中)这个镀金的铜盘以一个张开双臂的中心人物为特色,以剪影形式示出,并由三个圆形切口的同心环围绕。这个人物左手拿着一个头,右手拿着一把新月刃刀(tumi)。新月形的头饰和围腰构成了人物的装饰。图中向外放射出四条带,每条带由一条线平分。这些射线可能代表蜘蛛的八条腿(Alva,2008;Cordy Collins,1992)。为形成圆形孔而移除的金属可能被重新用于形成悬挂物,每个悬挂物都由固定在圆盘背面的金属丝固定在适当的位置,并悬挂在每个切割孔附近。其他圆形悬挂物沿着圆盘的圆周悬挂,也悬挂在人物的束腰外衣和射线上。在最初的状态下,镀金圆盘的闪闪发光一定很引人注目

在莫切的图像学中,手持奖杯头和图米刀的人物被认为是一位被称为Decapitator的神(Cordy Collins,1992;另一个例子是大都会博物馆的收藏,见登录号1982.392.8),图中还展示了一个有条纹的牙齿和精心制作的头饰(另见1979.206.1247)。这个强大的人物与蜘蛛联系在一起的意义尚不清楚,但也许蜘蛛在排出猎物的重要液体之前将其困在网中的方式与Moche的战斗和囚犯牺牲实践有关(Alva,2008;Cordy Collins,1992)

像本例这样的磁盘的使用尚不清楚。它们可能曾经是盾牌的正面,附在一根藤条上,现在已经失传了。这种金属装饰的精致本质在战斗中几乎没有提供任何物理保护,但其图像本身可能被认为具有某些比喻的性质。或者,这些圆盘可能已经连接到织物横幅或其他类型的物体上

公元200-850年,在印加人崛起之前的几个世纪,摩切人(也称为摩奇卡人)在秘鲁北海岸蓬勃发展。在大约六个世纪的过程中,莫切人建立了繁荣的地区中心,从南部的尼佩尼亚河谷到北部的皮乌拉河,靠近与厄瓜多尔的现代边界,将沿海沙漠开发成丰富的农田,并利用太平洋洪堡流的丰富海洋资源。尽管莫切人从未形成一个单一的中央集权政治实体,但他们有着统一的文化特征,如宗教习俗(Donnan,2010)

据说这件物品是在洛马内格拉的墓地发现的,那里是莫切文化最北部的前哨之一。Loma Negra的金属作品与南部的Moche遗址(如Ucupe)发现的陶瓷和金属制品有着相似的图像(Bourget,2014)。然而,Loma Negra和Moche"心脏地带"之间的确切关系仍然是一个争论的主题(Kaulick,2006)

参考文献和进一步阅读

Alva Meneses,Néstor Ignacio。"莫切图像学中的蜘蛛和蜘蛛衰变:从Sipán、前因和象征主义的背景下的识别",载于Steve Bourget和Kimberly L.Jones编辑的《莫切的艺术与考古:秘鲁北海岸的古代安第斯社会》,第247-261页。奥斯汀:得克萨斯大学出版社,2008年

Bourget,Steve。民主之路:古老的和平之路。巴黎:艺术颂;日内瓦:MEG,日内瓦人种学博物馆,2014年

科迪·柯林斯,阿拉娜。《古代主义还是传统?丘比特和早期摩切图像学中的颓废主题》,《拉丁美洲古董3》(1992),第207-219页。

异议,汉斯·迪特里希。《秘鲁北部洛马内格拉的金属》,《安蒂克世界报》第3卷(1972年),第43–53页

Donnan,Christopher B."莫切国家宗教",载于杰弗里·奎尔特和路易斯·海梅·卡斯蒂略主编的《莫切政治组织的新视角》,第47-69页。华盛顿特区:邓巴顿橡树研究图书馆和收藏,2010年

琼斯,朱莉。"Mochica金属艺术作品:综述",载于《前哥伦布时代的南美洲冶金》,伊丽莎白·P·本森主编,第53-104页。华盛顿特区:敦巴顿橡树研究图书馆和收藏,1979年。

Jones、Julie和Heidi King。"美洲的黄金",《大都会艺术博物馆公报》第59卷,第4期(2002年春季)

考利克,彼得。"Vicús-Mochica关系",载于《安第斯考古III》,由William H.Isbell和Helene H.Silverman编辑,第85-111页。马萨诸塞州波士顿:施普林格,2006年

Lechtman、Heather、Antonieta Erling和Edward J.Barry Jr."莫切冶金的新视角:秘鲁北部洛马内格拉的镀金技术",《美国古董》第47卷(1982年),第3-30页

Schorsch,Deborah,Ellen G.Howe和Mark T.Wypyski,《洛马内格拉的镀银和镀金铜金属制品:制造与美学》,Boletín Museo del Oro第4卷(1996年),第145-163页。"秘鲁洛马内格拉的金银莫切工艺品",《大都会博物馆期刊》第33卷(1998年),第109-136页。
介绍(英)This gilded copper disk features a central figure with outstretched arms, shown in silhouette, and encircled by three concentric rings of circular cut-outs. The figure holds a head in his left hand and a crescent-bladed knife (tumi) in his right hand. A crescent headdress and a loincloth complete the figure’s adornments. Four bands, each bisected by a line, emanate outward from the figure. Such rays may represent the eight legs of a spider (Alva, 2008; Cordy-Collins, 1992). The metal removed to create the circular holes was likely repurposed to create the dangles, each held in place by wires fixed to the back of the disk and suspended near each cut-out hole. Other circular dangles are suspended along the circumference of the disk, as well as from the figure’s tunic and rays. In its original state the shimmering of the gilded disks must have been striking.

In Moche iconography, figures holding a trophy head and a tumi knife have been identified as a god known as the Decapitator (Cordy-Collins, 1992; for another example in the Met’s collection, see accession number 1982.392.8). In many representations, the figure is also shown with barred teeth and an elaborate headdress (see also 1979.206.1247). The significance of the association of this powerful figure with spiders in unknown, but perhaps the manner in which spiders trap their prey in a web before draining them of their vital fluids had relevance to the Moche practice of battle and prisoner sacrifice (Alva, 2008; Cordy-Collins, 1992).

The use of disks such as the present example is unclear. They may have served as shield frontals, attached to a cane backing, now lost. The delicate nature of this metal ornament would have provided little physical protection in battle, but the imagery itself may have been thought to have certain apotropaic qualities. Alternatively, these disks may have been attached to textile banners or some other type of object.

The Moche (also known as the Mochicas) flourished on Peru’s North Coast from 200-850 A.D., centuries before the rise of the Incas. Over the course of some six centuries, the Moche built thriving regional centers from the Nepeña River Valley in the south to perhaps as far north as the Piura River, near the modern border with Ecuador, developing coastal deserts into rich farmlands and drawing upon the abundant maritime resources of the Pacific Ocean’s Humboldt Current. Although the Moche never formed a single centralized political entity, they shared unifying cultural traits such as religious practices (Donnan, 2010).

This object was said to have been found at the burial site of Loma Negra, which was one of the most northern outposts of Moche culture. Loma Negra works in metal share similar iconography with ceramics and metalwork found at Moche sites father to the south, such as Ucupe (Bourget, 2014). The precise relationship between Loma Negra and the Moche “heartland” remains a subject of debate, however (Kaulicke, 2006).

References and Further Reading

Alva Meneses, Néstor Ignacio. “Spiders and Spider Decapitations in Moche Iconography: Identification from the Contexts of Sipán, Antecedents and Symbolism.” In The Art and Archeology of the Moche: An Ancient Andean Society of the Peruvian North Coast, edited by Steve Bourget and Kimberly L. Jones, pp. 247-261. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2008.

Bourget, Steve. Les rois mochica: Divinité et pouvoir dans le Pérou ancien. Paris: Somogy éditions d'art; Geneva: MEG, Musée d'ethnographie de Genève, 2014.

Cordy-Collins, Alana. “Archaism or Tradition? The Decapitation Theme in Cupisnique and Early Moche Iconography.” Latin American Antiquity 3 (1992) pp. 207-219.

Disselhoff, Hans-Dietrich. “Metallschmuck aus der Loma Negra, Vicus (Nord-Peru).” Antike Welt vol. 3 (1972), pp. 43–53.

Donnan, Christopher B. “Moche State Religion.” In New Perspectives on Moche Political Organization, edited by Jeffrey Quilter and Luis Jaime Castillo, pp. 47-69. Washington D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 2010.

Jones, Julie. “Mochica Works of Art in Metal: A Review.” In Pre-Columbian Metallurgy of South America, edited by Elizabeth P. Benson, pp. 53-104. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 1979.

Jones, Julie, and Heidi King. “Gold of the Americas.” The Bulletin of the Metropolitan Museum of Art vol. 59, no. 4 (Spring 2002).

Kaulicke, Peter. “The Vicús-Mochica Relationship.” In Andean Archaeology III, edited by William H. Isbell and Helene H. Silverman, pp. 85-111. Boston, MA: Springer, 2006.

Lechtman, Heather, Antonieta Erling, and Edward J. Barry Jr. “New Perspectives on Moche Metallurgy: Techniques of Gilding Copper at Loma Negra, Northern Peru.” American Antiquity vol. 47 (1982), pp. 3-30.

Schorsch, Deborah, Ellen G. Howe, and Mark T. Wypyski, “Silvered and Gilded Copper Metalwork from Loma Negra: Manufacture and Aesthetics.” Boletín Museo del Oro vol. 4 (1996), pp. 145-163.

Schorsch, Deborah. "Silver-and-Gold Moche Artifacts from Loma Negra, Peru." Metropolitan Museum Journal vol. 33 (1998), pp. 109-136.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。