微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)壁龛中人物的研究(圣安布罗斯;校长);建筑研究:虚构壁龛的四种替代设计和与加兰(verso)无关的设计,约1560-67年
品名(英)Study of a Figure in a Niche (Saint Ambrose; recto); Architectural Studies: Four Alternative Designs for Fictive Niches and an Unrelated Design with Garlands (verso), ca. 1560-67
入馆年号1995年,1995.305
策展部门绘画和印刷品Drawings and Prints
创作者Giuseppe Arcimboldo【1527 至 1593】【意大利人】
创作年份公元 1564 - 公元 1565
创作地区
分类图画(Drawings)
尺寸13-13/16 x 10-3/8 英寸 (35.1 x 26.3 厘米)
介绍(中)朱利奥·博拉(Giulio Bora)首先提出了大都会博物馆绘画的阿尔钦博尔多归属(引用于佳士得拍卖目录,伦敦,1995年7月4日,拍品编号37;另见Bora 1998,其下落被列为"già a Londra"),最近由朱塞佩·西里洛(Giuseppe Cirillo)重申,因为它在风格,技术证据的基础上完全令人信服, 以及此处讨论的文件的背景。

大都会博物馆的图纸可追溯到大约 1560-67 年,曾经由杰出的米兰收藏家朱塞佩·瓦拉尔迪(Giuseppe Vallardi,1784-1863 年)拥有,与米兰市政厅(Municipio)委托设计一个享有盛誉但备受争议的委托有关,但代表圣安布罗斯的横幅,圣安布罗斯是这座城市的英雄赞助人,也是教会的规范医生之一。从对幸存文件的解释中出现的模棱两可的情景表明,阿尔钦博尔多可能在 1562 年离开米兰为布拉格宫廷设计圣安布罗斯旗帜时放弃了这个项目,并且委托可能已于 1563 年 2 月 18 日移交给卡洛·乌尔比诺, 因为这份日期的文件描述了后一位艺术家"承担了为新旗帜在纸上和布上绘制设计的工作"("哈普雷索·拉·卡里卡·德·费雷在皮图拉的《宪章和泰拉·迪尔·新相册》;奇维科历史档案馆,米兰地方,S.安布罗焦,贡法隆,第309/4号[1563年2月18日];此处,如罗伯特·米勒转录,"Gli affreschi cinquecenteschi: Giuseppe Arcimboldo, Giuseppe Meda e Giovanni Battista Della Rovere detto il Fiammenghino",载于《蒙扎大教堂:La storia e l'arte》,2卷,米兰,Electa,1989-1990年,第226页)。

这些文件还说,横幅的最终执行将由刺绣师巴尔托洛梅奥·雷诺内(Bartolomeo Rainone)完成,但整个项目在1564年中断,在激烈的专业争议中,现代学者对此给出了不同的描述(比较朱利奥·博拉(Giulio Bora)的意见,"注意cremonesi,II:L'eredità di Camillo ed i Campi",Paragone, [1977年5月]第327期,第54-88页;朱利奥·博拉在奥马焦·蒂齐亚诺:米兰文化艺术,卡洛五世。猫,米兰,皇宫,米兰,1977年,第52-54页[注释58-61],62-86页;桑德里娜·班德拉·比斯托莱蒂在丹尼尔·佩斯卡莫纳,迪塞尼·隆巴迪·德尔·五种和米兰档案馆,exh。猫,布雷拉美术馆,米兰;佛罗伦萨,1986年,第92-96页;米勒,1989-90年,同前,第216-28页,注48;Bora 1998,同前,第52-55页;Cirillo 2005年,同前,第57-59页)。从可以看出,在 1564 年 11 月 6 日向米兰大教堂法布里克里·德尔大教堂提起的法律诉讼中,不经意地提到了另一个项目,即委托阿尔钦博尔多的合作伙伴("compagno")绘制大教堂风琴百叶窗的著名委员会,似乎也阐明了圣安布罗斯旗帜的设计, 大都会博物馆的绘画实际上与该项目有关,因为后一份文件暗示了贝纳迪诺·坎皮和阿尔钦博尔多("在不同的沃尔特·康科伦蒂亚")之间关于圣安布罗斯("圣安布罗焦")旗帜的反复竞争情况,以及将通过艺术家将各自的设计提交给公司法庭("Dodici del Tribunale di Provvisione")来解决的争议。这份关于圣安布罗焦旗帜的文件在米兰大教堂档案馆(Ordinazione,XII,fols. 124 recto-125 recto;米勒,1989-1990年,同前,第216、227页,注1)。代表Fabbriceri del Duomo的评委("stimatori")是Giovanni Francesco Melzi(莱昂纳多的学生和继承人)和Girolamo Figino,他们还裁定与Giuseppe Meda合作的Giuseppe Arcimboldo的"confalone del nuovo S.to Ambroso"的图纸远远优于Bernardino Campi的设计,Arcimboldo的设计是选择执行的设计。这些文件的措辞提供了明确无误的证据,"在Miller 1989-90中转录,同前,第216、226页,但在Enrico Cattaneo等人中也引用了非常多样的引用, 《米兰大教堂》,米兰,1973年,第2卷,第193-97页;Bora 1977,同前,第52页;班德拉·比斯托莱蒂,1986年,同前,第92页;和Bora 1998,同前,第41页)。重新设计的圣安布罗焦旗帜由更熟练的刺绣师西皮奥尼·德尔菲诺内和卡米洛·普斯特拉(比雷诺内)签订了合同(1565 年 7 月 14 日的文件),他们将按照提供的图纸执行。虽然在1566年9月初完成,但阿尔钦博尔多在1567年10月10日和12月30日收取了两笔款项,"为上述旗帜绘制的第一幅图纸"("Per i primi dissegni fatti del sopradetto confalone")。Sant'Ambrogio的旗帜今天在米兰斯福尔扎城堡的Civiche Raccolte d'Arte展出。

大都会博物馆的绘画一定是Arcimboldo为他赢得比赛绘制的"nuovo confalone"或新旗帜而进行的早期研究之一。因为,确认文件中隐含的场景,存在一个大的,相对干燥的,或多或少完成的构图图,很像设计中的最终横幅,现在在米兰的Arcivescovado([inv.36],用钢笔和棕色墨水,刷子和棕色水洗完成,用白色水粉突出显示,在赭石准备好的纸上; 54,5 x 37,5厘米)。尽管米兰Arcivescovado的这张表一再发表,注明了Bernardino Campi的归属(如Bora 1977所示和讨论,同前,第84-85页,第52号;随后在Bandera Bistoletti 1986年,第92-96页,第31期),几乎可以肯定的是,罗伯特·米勒提出的朱塞佩·梅达的替代归属是正确的(米勒1989-90, 第216-230页[特别是第225页,图195];接受于Bora 1998,第40页,图。3;Cirillo 2005,第58页)。无论如何,可以在这里补充一点,朱塞佩·梅达(Giuseppe Meda)在米兰Arcivescovado和Arcimboldo的大都会艺术博物馆的图纸纸张都带有类似的水印,一只手被星星覆盖;第一个接近煤球 10719-10720,而大都会表接近煤球 10796。梅达在米兰Arcivescovado的画作有些死气沉沉且相当苛刻的建模(然而,这显然是横幅的亲笔签名研究,而不是复制品)提供了关键图像元素的细节,因为它们今天在斯福尔扎城堡的最后一面横幅中呈现。这些图像图案也以更不成熟的形式出现在大都会艺术博物馆阿尔钦博尔多(Arcimboldo)绘画的充满活力的整体构图中。然而,毫无疑问,朱塞佩·梅达(Giuseppe Meda)在米兰Arcivescovado绘制的绘画中的人物和装饰品的设计和细节似乎更接近斯福尔扎城堡最终横幅的构图,而不是Arcimboldo的大都会博物馆绘画。

Arcimboldo为横幅设计的驱动概念是人物的建筑环境,具有巨大的纪念意义。他的大都会演示图(一种早期的"modello")为侧面的幻觉建筑框架提供了两种替代解决方案;设计的这种"de choix"特征通常是图纸的特征,以供顾客批准。在左半部分,小山墙壁龛和讲台被各种蜗壳所覆盖,并由一个巨大的、精心雕刻的控制台支撑。直线元素在纸张的右半部分占主导地位,但它们的精确配置很难判断,因为另一位艺术家切除了一幅正方形的图纸,并用不相关的漩涡装饰设计取而代之。与建筑相反,这些人物大致涂有浅棕色的水洗。中间的大型粗略裸体人物举起右手表示祝福,就像全副武装的圣安布罗斯在斯福尔扎城堡的最后一面旗帜中所做的那样。大都会图画底部的纹章符号,包括主壁龛下方中央的斯福尔扎-维斯康蒂家族的纹章,似乎都符合最终横幅中描绘的那些,显然也符合梅达在米兰Arcivescovado的绘画中的纹章符号。

虽然证明了对朱利奥·坎皮(Giulio Campi)的制图技巧的特别仔细的研究(在我看来),但大都会板正面主纸支撑上的建筑图纸的风格和技术也明显归因于Arcimboldo,因为它们与沿着直肠下边界的装饰通道完全可媲美。大都会表正面的这些矩形壁龛和装饰山墙的孤立设计也是为圣安布罗斯两侧的虚构建筑而设计的,并且与梅达在米兰Arcivescovado的绘画中描绘的横向设计非常相似,今天在斯福尔扎城堡的最后一面横幅中。但是这些反面的图画被分散注意力的补丁所破坏,其中包含用另一只手粘在纸张上的不相关的设计(见左下角,反面),如果仅从照片中研究这幅图,可能会忽略这些事实。

(卡门·班巴赫)
介绍(英)The attribution to Arcimboldo of the Metropolitan Museum drawing was first suggested by Giulio Bora (cited in Christie's sale catalogue, London, July 4, 1995, lot 37; see also Bora 1998 with its whereabouts listed as "già a Londra"), and was recently reaffirmed by Giuseppe Cirillo, as it is entirely convincing on the basis of style, technical evidence, and context of the documents here discussed.

Datable to ca. 1560-67 and once owned by the distinguished Milanese collector Giuseppe Vallardi (1784–1863), the Metropolitan Museum drawing relates to the design of a prestigious, though much disputed commission by the Municipio (town-hall) of Milan for a banner representing Saint Ambrose, the heroic patron of the city who is also one of the canonical Doctors of the Church. The ambiguous scenario emerging from the interpretations of the surviving documents indicates that Arcimboldo may have ceded this project to design a banner of Saint Ambrose at the time of his departure from Milan in 1562 for the court of Prague, and that the commission may have been passed onto Carlo Urbino on February 18, 1563, for a document of this date describes the latter artist "as having assumed the job of making a design to be painted on paper and on cloth for the new banner" ("ha preso la carica de fare in pittura in carta et tela il dissegno dil nuovo confalone"; Archivio Storico Civico, Località milanesi, S. Ambrogio, Gonfalone, no. 309/4 [18 febbraio 1563]; here, as transcribed by Robert S. Miller, "Gli affreschi cinquecenteschi: Giuseppe Arcimboldo, Giuseppe Meda e Giovanni Battista Della Rovere detto il Fiammenghino," in Il Duomo di Monza: La storia e l’arte, 2 vols. Milan, Electa, 1989-1990, p. 226).

The documents also tell that the final execution of the banner was to be done by the embroiderer Bartolomeo Rainone, but the entire project was interrupted in 1564, amidst a heated professional controversy, of which modern scholars have given different accounts (compare opinions in Giulio Bora, "Note cremonesi, II: L'eredità di Camillo ed i Campi," Paragone, no. 327 [May 1977], pp. 54-88; Giulio Bora in Omaggio a Tiziano: La cultura artistica milanese nell'età di Carlo V, exh. cat., Milan, Palazzo Reale, Milan, 1977, pp. 52-54 [notes 58-61], 62-86; Sandrina Bandera Bistoletti in Daniele Pescarmona, Disegni Lombardi del Cinque e Seicento della Pinacoteca di Brera e dell'Archivescovado di Milano, exh. cat., Pinacoteca di Brera, Milan; Florence, 1986, pp. 92-96; Miller 1989-90, op. cit., pp. 216-28, note 48; Bora 1998, op. cit., pp. 52-55; Cirillo 2005, op. cit., pp. 57-59). From what can be discerned, a casual mention in the legal complaint filed on November 6, 1564 to the Fabbriceri del Duomo of Milan regarding another project, the prestigious commission to paint the organ shutters of the Cathedral entrusted to Giuseppe Meda, partner ("compagno") of Arcimboldo, also seems to shed light on the design of the banner of Saint Ambrose, the project to which the Metropolitan Museum drawing actually relates, as this latter document alludes to a repeatedly competitive situation between Bernardino Campi and Arcimboldo ("in diverse volte a concorentia") regarding the banner of Saint Ambrose ("Sant’Ambrogio"), and to a dispute which was to be settled by the artists' submission of their respective designs to a corporate tribunal (the "Dodici del Tribunale di Provvisione"). This document about the banner of Sant’Ambrogio is in the Archivio della Fabbrica del Duomo di Milano (Ordinazione, XII, fols. 124 recto-125 recto; Miller 1989-1990, op. cit., pp. 216, 227, note 1). The judges ("stimatori") on behalf of the Fabbriceri del Duomo were Giovanni Francesco Melzi (pupil and heir of Leonardo) and Girolamo Figino, who also ruled that the drawing for the "confalone del nuovo S.to Ambroso" by Giuseppe Arcimboldo, who was in partnership with Giuseppe Meda, was far superior to the design by Bernardino Campi, and that Arcimboldo’s was the design chosen for execution. The wording of these documents provides unmistakable proof, "fu per li predicti signori Meltio et Figino indicato il disegno desso Bernardino [Campi] essere molto inferiore al disegno desso magistro Joseph [Giuseppe Arcimboldo] qual fu acetate et messe in opera" (here, as transcribed in Miller 1989-90, op. cit., pp. 216, 226, but also quoted very diversely in Enrico Cattaneo et al., Il Duomo di Milano, Milan, 1973, vol. 2, pp. 193-97; Bora 1977, op. cit., p. 52; Bandera Bistoletti 1986, op. cit., p. 92; and Bora 1998, op. cit., p. 41). The redesigned banner of Sant’Ambrogio was contracted to be executed (document July 14, 1565) by the more skilled embroiderers Scipioni Delfinone and Camillo Pusterla (than Rainone), who were to follow the drawing that was provided. Although completed in early September 1566, Arcimboldo collected two payments on 10 October and 30 December 1567, "for the first drawings made for the said banner" ("per i primi dissegni fatti del sopradetto confalone"). The banner of Sant’Ambrogio is today on display in the Civiche Raccolte d'Arte of Castello Sforzesco, Milan.

The Metropolitan Museum drawing must have been one of the early studies by Arcimboldo for his winning competition drawing of the "nuovo confalone," or new banner. For, confirming the scenario implied in the documents, there exists a large, relatively dry, more or less finished composition drawing much like the final banner in design, now in the Arcivescovado, Milan ([inv. 36], done in pen and brown ink, brush and brown wash, highlighted with white gouache, on ochre prepared paper; 54,5 x 37,5 cm.). Although this sheet in the Arcivescovado, Milan, has been repeatedly published with an attribution to Bernardino Campi (as illustrated and discussed in Bora 1977, op. cit., pp. 84-85, no. 52; followed in Bandera Bistoletti 1986, pp. 92-96, no. 31), it is almost certain that the alternative attribution to Giuseppe Meda, as advanced by Robert Miller, is correct (Miller 1989-90, pp. 216-230 [especially p. 225, fig. 195]; accepted in Bora 1998, p. 40, fig. 3; Cirillo 2005, p. 58). In any case, it can be added here that the papers of the drawings in the Arcivescovado, Milan, by Giuseppe Meda and Metropolitan Museum of Art by Arcimboldo exhibit similar watermarks, a hand surmounted by a star; the first is close to Briquet 10719-10720, while the Metropolitan sheet is close to Briquet 10796. Meda’s somewhat lifeless and rather harshly modelled drawing in the Arcivescovado, Milan (which is nevertheless clearly an autograph study for the banner, not a copy) offers an elaboration of details of the key iconographic elements as they are represented in the final banner today at the Castello Sforzesco. These iconographic motifs are also indicated, though in a more inchoate form, in the energetic overall composition of the drawing by Arcimboldo in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Without doubt, however, the design and the details of the figure and ornament in the drawing by Giuseppe Meda in the Arcivescovado, Milan, seem closer to the composition of the final banner at the Castello Sforzesco, than is the Metropolitan Museum drawing by Arcimboldo.

The driving concept in Arcimboldo's design for the banner is the architectural setting for the figure, which is of great monumentality. His Metropolitan demonstration drawing (a type of early "modello") offers two alternative solutions for the illusionistic architectural framework at the sides; this "de choix" feature of the design is often characteristic of drawings for the approval of patrons. On the left half, the small pedimented niche and podium are surmounted by variations of volutes and supported by a monumental, elaborately carved console. Rectilinear elements predominate on the right half of the sheet, but their precise disposition is difficult to judge, since another artist excised a square piece of the drawing and replaced it with the unrelated design of a cartouche. In contrast to the architecture, the figures are broadly painted with light brown wash. The large sketchy nude figure in the center raises his right hand in blessing, as the fully garbed Saint Ambrose does in the final banner at the Castello Sforzesco. The heraldic symbols at the bottom of the Metropolitan drawing, including the coat of arms of the Sforza-Visconti family at center, below the main niche, all seem to conform to those depicted in the final banner, and apparently also to those in Meda’s drawing in the Arcivescovado, Milan.

Although evidencing a particularly close study of Giulio Campi's draftsmanship (in my opinion), the style and technique of the architectural drawings on the main paper support of the verso of the Metropolitan sheet are also clearly attributable to Arcimboldo, as they are exactly comparable to the ornamental passages along the lower border of the recto. These isolated designs of rectangular niches and ornamented pediments on the verso of the Metropolitan sheet were also intended for the fictive architecture flanking Saint Ambrose, and are very similar to the lateral designs portrayed in Meda’s drawing in the Arcivescovado, Milan, and in the final banner today in the Castello Sforzesco. But these verso drawings are much disfigured by the distracting patch containing unrelated designs glued onto the sheet (seen at lower left, on the verso) by a different hand, facts which may be overlooked if this drawing is only studied from photographs.

(Carmen C. Bambach)
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。