微信公众号 
图码生活

每天发布有五花八门的文章,各种有趣的知识等,期待您的订阅与参与
搜索结果最多仅显示 10 条随机数据
结果缓存两分钟
如需更多更快搜索结果请访问小程序
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国纽约大都会艺术博物馆展品查阅
美国大都会艺术博物馆中的24万件展品,图片展示以及中文和英文双语介绍(中文翻译仅供参考)
读取中
读取中
读取中
品名(中)葬礼工作人员
品名(英)Funerary Staffs
入馆年号1979年,1979.206.1027
策展部门迈克尔·洛克菲勒之翼The Michael C. Rockefeller Wing
创作者
创作年份公元 1400 - 公元 1600
创作地区秘鲁(Peru)
分类木雕(Wood-Sculpture)
尺寸高 74 3/8 × 宽 6 3/4 × 深 2 1/4 英寸 (189 × 17.1 × 5.7 厘米)
介绍(中)这块气势恢宏的雕刻板由algarrobo木材(Prosopis chilensis)制成,其下三分之一是平坦的,末端是圆形的桨状下边缘。连接下部和工具顶部人物的轴被雕刻得错综复杂,形成了一个中空的三维网格或透雕钻石图案。竖井的顶部是一个球状的土堆,上面矗立着五个人;中心人物的一只手放在他两侧两个人物的头上。侧面的人物则站着,一只脚放在垂直于土堆雕刻的、面朝外的蹲着的人物的背上。两对站立的人物雕刻在轴的下端两侧,在桨的顶部。除了最上面的那个人以外,所有的人都把杯子放在胸前。该器具的正面和背面与背靠背雕刻的数字相同。颜料的痕迹和金属的小碎片保留在某些区域中,这表明该器具曾经用油漆和银片进行过高度装饰(另见MMA登录号1979.206.1025和1979.206.10.28)。

所有这些挖掘板的科学挖掘实例都是在秘鲁南海岸的钦查和伊卡山谷发现的,可以追溯到15-16世纪。多年来,这些物体的功能一直是学者们讨论的热点。有时被称为坟墓标记,它们也被称为remos(西班牙语中桨或桨的意思),因为它们与西班牙编年史家描述的前柱船上使用的舵板相似(Koda,1989;Kvietok,1997)。然而,没有观察到任何证据表明,正如人们从航海工具中所预期的那样,叶片会因浸水而变形。相比之下,对科学挖掘的坟墓中发现的类似但较小的物品的使用模式的分析表明,它们可能是用于准备种植土壤的农具的代表。尽管这个例子和那些形状和大小相似的例子没有显示出使用模式,而且很难处理,但带有扁平刀片的较小木雕在底端显示出磨损模式,这与被推入含有小岩石的土壤中一致。在中间和轴向边缘都有锥形的宽而平的末端的工具会被用来像犁一样翻土,而其他末端钝或圆的木制物体会用来打碎土块。像本例这样雕刻精美的大型木板很可能是仪式性的,可能用于农业肥力的仪式。秘鲁海岸位于太平洋水域和安第斯山脉突然上升之间,狭窄而干燥。沿着南美洲大陆西侧流动的洪堡洋流的冷水支持着世界上一些最丰富的海洋生物,但同时也造成了大气条件,阻止了沿海山谷的降雨。海岸沙漠被从安第斯山脉输送水的河流一分为二,尽管这些食物最终很少到达谷底。只有通过勤奋的水资源管理,特别是灌溉农业,古代居民才能利用肥沃的山谷土壤

然而,这片土地非常干旱,保存了许多易腐的考古遗迹。由脆弱的有机材料制成的葬礼用品,如葫芦、骨头、木材、羽毛和纤维,在更潮湿的环境中埋葬了几个世纪,就无法幸存下来。南部海岸是秘鲁最干旱的地区,自19世纪中期以来,那里出土了许多由有机材料制成的文物。伊卡和纳斯卡山谷出产了大量纺织品、木制物品和其他易腐烂物质的作品,揭示了古代安第斯视觉传统的一些方面,否则这些方面将是未知的

进一步阅读

Jones,Julie。帝国艺术:秘鲁的印加。纽约:原始艺术博物馆,1964年。特别参见第42–43、46–48页。

Koda,Yae。秘鲁南海岸的史前农具。博士论文,加州大学伯克利分校,1989年。

Kvietok,D.Peter。"挖掘棍子还是匕首板?对伊卡地区木板的功能分析",《安第斯历史:1》(1987),第247-274页

施密特,马克斯·昆斯特和库尔图尔·冯·秘鲁。柏林:Propylaen Verlag,1929年。特别参见第428、429、431、430、432、433页。

大都会艺术博物馆。原始艺术博物馆的大洋洲、非洲和美洲艺术。纽约:大都会艺术馆,1969年,编号536。
介绍(英)This imposing sculpted board, made from algarrobo wood (Prosopis chilensis), features a plain lower third terminating in a rounded, paddle-like lower edge. The shaft linking the lower section with the figures at the top of the implement was intricately carved to form a hollow three-dimensional lattice or openwork diamond pattern. The shaft is surmounted by a bulbous mound on which stand five figures; the central figure has a hand on head of the two figures flanking him. The flanking figures, in turn, stand with one foot on the backs of crouching figures carved perpendicular to the mound and facing outward. Two pairs of standing figures were carved on either side of the lower end of the shaft, at the top of the paddle. All figures but the one at the top center hold a cup to their chests. The front and back sides of the implement are identical with figures carved back to back. Traces of pigment and small fragments of metal remain in certain regions, suggesting that the implement was once highly embellished with paint and silver sheet (see also MMA accession number 1979.206.1025 and 1979.206.1028).

All of the scientifically excavated examples of these digging boards have been found in the Chincha and Ica valleys on Peru’s South Coast and date to the 15th–16th century. The function of these objects has been a lively topic of discussion among scholars for many years. Sometimes called tomb markers, they have also been called remos (Spanish for paddle or oar) because of their resemblance to the rudder boards used on Precolumbian boats described by Spanish chroniclers (Koda, 1989; Kvietok, 1997). However, no evidence of blade deformation due to water immersion, as one might expect from nautical implements, has been observed. In contrast, analysis of use patterns of similar, but smaller, objects found in scientifically excavated tombs indicates that they are probably representations of agricultural implements used for preparing the soil for planting. Although this example and those of similar shape and size show no use patterns and would be awkward to handle, smaller wooden carvings with flat blades show abrasion patterns on the bottom ends consistent with having been thrust into soil containing small rocks. Tools with broad flat ends tapered at both the medial and axial edges would have been used to turn the soil similar to a plow, whereas other wooden objects with blunt or rounded ends would have served to break up the clods. Large, finely carved and painted boards such as the present example were likely ceremonial, used perhaps in rituals dedicated to agricultural fertility. The coast of Peru between the waters of the Pacific Ocean and the abrupt rising of the Andes Mountains is narrow and extremely dry. The cold waters of the Humboldt current, which flow along the west side of the South American continent, supports some of the richest marine life in the world, but at the same time they cause atmospheric conditions that prevent rain from falling in the coastal valleys. The coastal desert is bisected by rivers carrying water from the Andes, although little of this sustenance ultimately reaches the valley floors. It was only with assiduous water management, specifically irrigation agriculture, that the ancient inhabitants were able to take advantage of the fertile valley soils.

The very aridity of the land, however, preserved many perishable archaeological remains. Funerary offerings made of fragile organic materials, such as gourd, bone, wood, feathers, and fibers, would not have survived the centuries of burial in more humid environments. The southern coast is the driest in Peru, and since the mid-nineteenth century many antiquities made of organic materials have been unearthed there. The Ica and Nasca valleys have yielded significant groups of textiles, wood objects, and other works of perishable substances, shedding light on aspects of ancient Andean visual traditions that would otherwise be unknown.

Further Reading

Jones, Julie. Art of Empire: The Inca of Peru. New York: The Museum of Primitive Art, 1964. See especially pp. 42–43, 46–48.

Koda, Yae. Prehistoric Agricultural Implements of the South Coast of Peru. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1989.

Kvietok, D. Peter. "Digging Sticks or Daggerboards? A Functional Analysis of Wooden Boards from the Ica Region," Andean Past: 1 (1987), pp. 247–274.

Schmidt, Max. Kunst und Kultur von Peru. Berlin: Propylaen Verlag, 1929. See especially pp. 428, 429, 431, 430, 432, 433.

The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Art of Oceania, Africa, and the Americas from the Museum of Primitive Art. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1969, no. 536.
  大都会艺术博物馆,英文 Metropolitan Museum of Art,是美国最大的艺术博物馆,世界著名博物馆,位于美国纽约第五大道的82号大街。
  大都会博物馆回顾了人类自身的文明史的发展,与中国北京的故宫、英国伦敦的大英博物馆、法国巴黎的卢浮宫、俄罗斯圣彼得堡的艾尔米塔什博物馆并称为世界五大博物馆。